A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. OBJECTIVES: Obtaining accurate pediatric weight is necessary during emergency resuscitation. Although several weight estimation methods exist, the most precise method has not been conclusively determined. This study aimed to evaluate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samerchua A., Suraseranivongse S., Komoltri C.
Format: Journal
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017411715&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/40569
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-40569
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-405692017-09-28T04:10:14Z A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation Samerchua A. Suraseranivongse S. Komoltri C. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. OBJECTIVES: Obtaining accurate pediatric weight is necessary during emergency resuscitation. Although several weight estimation methods exist, the most precise method has not been conclusively determined. This study aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability, and practicality of these tools. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in healthy Thai children aged 6 months to 12 years. Correlations between estimated and actual weights were tested. Validity was assessed by mean bias (estimated weight minus actual weight) and accuracy (10% error). Practicality was evaluated by time usage and data derived from user questionnaires. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty participants with mean age of 6.7 years and mean weight of 26 kg were enrolled. A strong correlation between estimated weight and actual weight in all methods was demonstrated. Parental estimation was the most accurate tool in all age groups, with the lowest overall mean error (ME) of −0.83 kg and the highest accuracy of 88.7%. The Broselow tape was the second most accurate tool in ages younger than 1 year and 1-to-5–year age groups (ME = 0.23 and 0.50 kg; accuracy = 55.3% and 54.1%, respectively). The Mercy method was the second most accurate tool in the 6-to-10–year and 11-to-12–year age groups (ME = −2.47 and −2.77; accuracy = 54.6% and 67.9%, respectively). The Broselow tape had the highest score for practicality of use. CONCLUSIONS: Parental estimation was the most accurate method in every age group. The next best alternative is the Broselow tape in children aged 5 years or younger and the Mercy method in children aged older than 5 years. 2017-09-28T04:10:14Z 2017-09-28T04:10:14Z Journal 07495161 2-s2.0-85017411715 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001137 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017411715&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/40569
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. OBJECTIVES: Obtaining accurate pediatric weight is necessary during emergency resuscitation. Although several weight estimation methods exist, the most precise method has not been conclusively determined. This study aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability, and practicality of these tools. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in healthy Thai children aged 6 months to 12 years. Correlations between estimated and actual weights were tested. Validity was assessed by mean bias (estimated weight minus actual weight) and accuracy (10% error). Practicality was evaluated by time usage and data derived from user questionnaires. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty participants with mean age of 6.7 years and mean weight of 26 kg were enrolled. A strong correlation between estimated weight and actual weight in all methods was demonstrated. Parental estimation was the most accurate tool in all age groups, with the lowest overall mean error (ME) of −0.83 kg and the highest accuracy of 88.7%. The Broselow tape was the second most accurate tool in ages younger than 1 year and 1-to-5–year age groups (ME = 0.23 and 0.50 kg; accuracy = 55.3% and 54.1%, respectively). The Mercy method was the second most accurate tool in the 6-to-10–year and 11-to-12–year age groups (ME = −2.47 and −2.77; accuracy = 54.6% and 67.9%, respectively). The Broselow tape had the highest score for practicality of use. CONCLUSIONS: Parental estimation was the most accurate method in every age group. The next best alternative is the Broselow tape in children aged 5 years or younger and the Mercy method in children aged older than 5 years.
format Journal
author Samerchua A.
Suraseranivongse S.
Komoltri C.
spellingShingle Samerchua A.
Suraseranivongse S.
Komoltri C.
A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation
author_facet Samerchua A.
Suraseranivongse S.
Komoltri C.
author_sort Samerchua A.
title A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation
title_short A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation
title_full A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation
title_fullStr A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Pediatric Weight Estimation Methods for Emergency Resuscitation
title_sort comparison of pediatric weight estimation methods for emergency resuscitation
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017411715&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/40569
_version_ 1681421841777819648