De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence

© 2016, The International Urogynecological Association. Introduction and hypothesis: There is a paucity of data evaluating the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women with no preoperative occult SUI. We hypothesized that apical suspens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alas A., Chinthakanan O., Espaillat L., Plowright L., Davila G., Aguilar V.
Format: Journal
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988727859&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/40615
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-40615
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-406152017-09-28T04:10:28Z De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence Alas A. Chinthakanan O. Espaillat L. Plowright L. Davila G. Aguilar V. © 2016, The International Urogynecological Association. Introduction and hypothesis: There is a paucity of data evaluating the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women with no preoperative occult SUI. We hypothesized that apical suspension procedures would have higher rates of de novo SUI. Methods: This was a retrospective database review of women who had surgery for POP from 2003 to 2013 and developed de novo SUI at ≥6 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, all patients had a negative stress test and no evidence of occult SUI on prolapse reduction urodynamics. The primary objective was to establish the incidence of de novo SUI in women with no objective evidence of preoperative occult SUI after POP surgeries at ≥6 months. Results: A total number of 274 patients underwent POP surgery. The overall incidence of de novo SUI was 9.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.14]. However, the incidence of de novo SUI in those with no baseline complaint of SUI was 4.4 % (95 % CI 0.03–0.1). There was no difference in de novo SUI rates between apical [9.7 % (n = 57)] and nonapical [10.5 %, (n = 217] procedures (p = 0.8482). Multivariate logistic regression identified sacrocolpopexy [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.54, 95 % CI 1.2–14.7] and those with a baseline complaint of SUI (adjusted OR 5.1; 95 % CI 2.2–12) as risk factors for de novo SUI. Conclusions: The incidence of de novo SUI after surgery for POP without occult SUI was 9.9 %. We recommend counseling patients about the risk of de novo SUI and offering a staged procedure. 2017-09-28T04:10:28Z 2017-09-28T04:10:28Z 4 Journal 09373462 2-s2.0-84988727859 10.1007/s00192-016-3149-7 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988727859&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/40615
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2016, The International Urogynecological Association. Introduction and hypothesis: There is a paucity of data evaluating the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women with no preoperative occult SUI. We hypothesized that apical suspension procedures would have higher rates of de novo SUI. Methods: This was a retrospective database review of women who had surgery for POP from 2003 to 2013 and developed de novo SUI at ≥6 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, all patients had a negative stress test and no evidence of occult SUI on prolapse reduction urodynamics. The primary objective was to establish the incidence of de novo SUI in women with no objective evidence of preoperative occult SUI after POP surgeries at ≥6 months. Results: A total number of 274 patients underwent POP surgery. The overall incidence of de novo SUI was 9.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.14]. However, the incidence of de novo SUI in those with no baseline complaint of SUI was 4.4 % (95 % CI 0.03–0.1). There was no difference in de novo SUI rates between apical [9.7 % (n = 57)] and nonapical [10.5 %, (n = 217] procedures (p = 0.8482). Multivariate logistic regression identified sacrocolpopexy [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.54, 95 % CI 1.2–14.7] and those with a baseline complaint of SUI (adjusted OR 5.1; 95 % CI 2.2–12) as risk factors for de novo SUI. Conclusions: The incidence of de novo SUI after surgery for POP without occult SUI was 9.9 %. We recommend counseling patients about the risk of de novo SUI and offering a staged procedure.
format Journal
author Alas A.
Chinthakanan O.
Espaillat L.
Plowright L.
Davila G.
Aguilar V.
spellingShingle Alas A.
Chinthakanan O.
Espaillat L.
Plowright L.
Davila G.
Aguilar V.
De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence
author_facet Alas A.
Chinthakanan O.
Espaillat L.
Plowright L.
Davila G.
Aguilar V.
author_sort Alas A.
title De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence
title_short De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence
title_full De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence
title_fullStr De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence
title_full_unstemmed De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence
title_sort de novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988727859&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/40615
_version_ 1681421850188447744