Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Background It has been shown that I f channels can be found in AV node, apart from the sinus node. Previous animal studies showed that I f inhibitor resulted in the rate-dependent reduction in AV node conduction during atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we aimed to ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wongcharoen W., Ruttanaphol A., Gunaparn S., Phrommintikul A.
Format: Journal
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988378432&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41223
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-41223
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-412232017-09-28T04:20:00Z Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Wongcharoen W. Ruttanaphol A. Gunaparn S. Phrommintikul A. © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Background It has been shown that I f channels can be found in AV node, apart from the sinus node. Previous animal studies showed that I f inhibitor resulted in the rate-dependent reduction in AV node conduction during atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we aimed to examine the effect of ivabradine on ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. Method This study was a prospective randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Ivabradine, 5 mg twice a day (n = 21), or placebo (n = 11) was administered for 1 month to adult patients with non-paroxysmal AF, in addition to standard therapy. The primary end point was the change in mean ventricular rate between baseline and 1 month, as assessed by 24-hour Holter. Results The baseline characteristics did not differ between ivabradine and placebo groups (mean age was 59.7 ± 13.3 years, male 62.5%). Mean 24-hour ventricular rate at baseline was comparable between 2 groups. We found that ivabradine significantly decreased mean ventricular rate from 86.0 ± 10.9 beats/min to 79.2 ± 9.6 beats/min (p  <  0.001). In contrast, no significant change in ventricular rate was observed in placebo group (84.3 ± 11.2 vs. 82.9 ± 9.9 beats/min, p = 0.469). The effect of ivabradine on rate reduction was significantly greater than placebo (6.9 ± 6.3 vs. 1.4 ± 6.0 beats/min, p = 0.024). No drug-related adverse effects were observed in both groups. Conclusion We demonstrated that ivabradine significantly decreased ventricular rate during AF compared to placebo. Therefore, ivabradine can be a potential treatment to improve ventricular control in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. Due to the small sample size, larger studies are needed to confirm this effect of ivabradine. 2017-09-28T04:20:00Z 2017-09-28T04:20:00Z 2016-12-01 Journal 01675273 2-s2.0-84988378432 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.044 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988378432&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41223
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Background It has been shown that I f channels can be found in AV node, apart from the sinus node. Previous animal studies showed that I f inhibitor resulted in the rate-dependent reduction in AV node conduction during atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we aimed to examine the effect of ivabradine on ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. Method This study was a prospective randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Ivabradine, 5 mg twice a day (n = 21), or placebo (n = 11) was administered for 1 month to adult patients with non-paroxysmal AF, in addition to standard therapy. The primary end point was the change in mean ventricular rate between baseline and 1 month, as assessed by 24-hour Holter. Results The baseline characteristics did not differ between ivabradine and placebo groups (mean age was 59.7 ± 13.3 years, male 62.5%). Mean 24-hour ventricular rate at baseline was comparable between 2 groups. We found that ivabradine significantly decreased mean ventricular rate from 86.0 ± 10.9 beats/min to 79.2 ± 9.6 beats/min (p  <  0.001). In contrast, no significant change in ventricular rate was observed in placebo group (84.3 ± 11.2 vs. 82.9 ± 9.9 beats/min, p = 0.469). The effect of ivabradine on rate reduction was significantly greater than placebo (6.9 ± 6.3 vs. 1.4 ± 6.0 beats/min, p = 0.024). No drug-related adverse effects were observed in both groups. Conclusion We demonstrated that ivabradine significantly decreased ventricular rate during AF compared to placebo. Therefore, ivabradine can be a potential treatment to improve ventricular control in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. Due to the small sample size, larger studies are needed to confirm this effect of ivabradine.
format Journal
author Wongcharoen W.
Ruttanaphol A.
Gunaparn S.
Phrommintikul A.
spellingShingle Wongcharoen W.
Ruttanaphol A.
Gunaparn S.
Phrommintikul A.
Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
author_facet Wongcharoen W.
Ruttanaphol A.
Gunaparn S.
Phrommintikul A.
author_sort Wongcharoen W.
title Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_short Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_full Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_sort ivabradine reduced ventricular rate in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988378432&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41223
_version_ 1681421962538123264