Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology Objective: To identify the best-performing survey definition of gout from items commonly available in epidemiologic studies. Methods: Survey definitions of gout were identified from 34 epidemiologic studies contributing to the Global Urate Genetics Consortium...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal |
Published: |
2017
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84997078109&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41284 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-41284 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-412842017-09-28T04:20:21Z Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard Dalbeth N. Schumacher H. Fransen J. Neogi T. Jansen T. Brown M. Louthrenoo W. Vazquez-Mellado J. Eliseev M. McCarthy G. Stamp L. Perez-Ruiz F. Sivera F. Ea H. Gerritsen M. Scire C. Cavagna L. Lin C. Chou Y. Tausche A. da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro G. Janssen M. Chen J. Cimmino M. Uhlig T. Taylor W. © 2016, American College of Rheumatology Objective: To identify the best-performing survey definition of gout from items commonly available in epidemiologic studies. Methods: Survey definitions of gout were identified from 34 epidemiologic studies contributing to the Global Urate Genetics Consortium (GUGC) genome-wide association study. Data from the Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria (SUGAR) were randomly divided into development and test data sets. A data-driven case definition was formed using logistic regression in the development data set. This definition, along with definitions used in GUGC studies and the 2015 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) gout classification criteria were applied to the test data set, using monosodium urate crystal identification as the gold standard. Results: For all tested GUGC definitions, the simple definition of “self-report of gout or urate-lowering therapy use” had the best test performance characteristics (sensitivity 82%, specificity 72%). The simple definition had similar performance to a SUGAR data-driven case definition with 5 weighted items: self-report, self-report of doctor diagnosis, colchicine use, urate-lowering therapy use, and hyperuricemia (sensitivity 87%, specificity 70%). Both of these definitions performed better than the 1977 American Rheumatism Association survey criteria (sensitivity 82%, specificity 67%). Of all tested definitions, the 2015 ACR/EULAR criteria had the best performance (sensitivity 92%, specificity 89%). Conclusion: A simple definition of “self-report of gout or urate-lowering therapy use” has the best test performance characteristics of existing definitions that use routinely available data. A more complex combination of features is more sensitive, but still lacks good specificity. If a more accurate case definition is required for a particular study, the 2015 ACR/EULAR gout classification criteria should be considered. 2017-09-28T04:20:21Z 2017-09-28T04:20:21Z 2016-12-01 Journal 2151464X 2-s2.0-84997078109 10.1002/acr.22896 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84997078109&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41284 |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
description |
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology Objective: To identify the best-performing survey definition of gout from items commonly available in epidemiologic studies. Methods: Survey definitions of gout were identified from 34 epidemiologic studies contributing to the Global Urate Genetics Consortium (GUGC) genome-wide association study. Data from the Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria (SUGAR) were randomly divided into development and test data sets. A data-driven case definition was formed using logistic regression in the development data set. This definition, along with definitions used in GUGC studies and the 2015 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) gout classification criteria were applied to the test data set, using monosodium urate crystal identification as the gold standard. Results: For all tested GUGC definitions, the simple definition of “self-report of gout or urate-lowering therapy use” had the best test performance characteristics (sensitivity 82%, specificity 72%). The simple definition had similar performance to a SUGAR data-driven case definition with 5 weighted items: self-report, self-report of doctor diagnosis, colchicine use, urate-lowering therapy use, and hyperuricemia (sensitivity 87%, specificity 70%). Both of these definitions performed better than the 1977 American Rheumatism Association survey criteria (sensitivity 82%, specificity 67%). Of all tested definitions, the 2015 ACR/EULAR criteria had the best performance (sensitivity 92%, specificity 89%). Conclusion: A simple definition of “self-report of gout or urate-lowering therapy use” has the best test performance characteristics of existing definitions that use routinely available data. A more complex combination of features is more sensitive, but still lacks good specificity. If a more accurate case definition is required for a particular study, the 2015 ACR/EULAR gout classification criteria should be considered. |
format |
Journal |
author |
Dalbeth N. Schumacher H. Fransen J. Neogi T. Jansen T. Brown M. Louthrenoo W. Vazquez-Mellado J. Eliseev M. McCarthy G. Stamp L. Perez-Ruiz F. Sivera F. Ea H. Gerritsen M. Scire C. Cavagna L. Lin C. Chou Y. Tausche A. da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro G. Janssen M. Chen J. Cimmino M. Uhlig T. Taylor W. |
spellingShingle |
Dalbeth N. Schumacher H. Fransen J. Neogi T. Jansen T. Brown M. Louthrenoo W. Vazquez-Mellado J. Eliseev M. McCarthy G. Stamp L. Perez-Ruiz F. Sivera F. Ea H. Gerritsen M. Scire C. Cavagna L. Lin C. Chou Y. Tausche A. da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro G. Janssen M. Chen J. Cimmino M. Uhlig T. Taylor W. Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard |
author_facet |
Dalbeth N. Schumacher H. Fransen J. Neogi T. Jansen T. Brown M. Louthrenoo W. Vazquez-Mellado J. Eliseev M. McCarthy G. Stamp L. Perez-Ruiz F. Sivera F. Ea H. Gerritsen M. Scire C. Cavagna L. Lin C. Chou Y. Tausche A. da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro G. Janssen M. Chen J. Cimmino M. Uhlig T. Taylor W. |
author_sort |
Dalbeth N. |
title |
Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard |
title_short |
Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard |
title_full |
Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard |
title_fullStr |
Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard |
title_full_unstemmed |
Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard |
title_sort |
survey definitions of gout for epidemiologic studies: comparison with crystal identification as the gold standard |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84997078109&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41284 |
_version_ |
1681421973679243264 |