Membership functions representing a number vs. representing a set: Proof of unique reconstruction
© 2016 IEEE. In some cases, a membership function μ(x) represents an unknown number, but in many other cases, it represents an unknown crisp set. In this case, for each crisp set S, we can estimate the degree μ(S) to which this set S is the desired one. A natural question is: once we know the values...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Nguyen H., Kreinovich V., Kosheleva O. |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Published: |
2017
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006725079&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41348 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
Similar Items
-
Membership functions representing a number vs. representing a set: Proof of unique reconstruction
by: Hung T. Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2018) -
How to fully represent expert information about imprecise properties in a computer system: random sets, fuzzy sets, and beyond: an overview
by: Nguyen H.T., et al.
Published: (2014) -
Finding minimum representative pattern sets
by: Liu, G., et al.
Published: (2013) -
How to fully represent expert information about imprecise properties in a computer system: Random sets, fuzzy sets, and beyond: An overview
by: Hung T. Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2018) -
How to fully represent expert information about imprecise properties in a computer system: Random sets, fuzzy sets, and beyond: An overview
by: Hung T. Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2018)