Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Background/objectives Gallstone disease and its complications are common, particularly in Western populations. Recent studies have reported a significantly increased risk of gallstones among hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Howeve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wijarnpreecha K., Thongprayoon C., Panjawatanan P., Manatsathit W., Ungprasert P.
Format: Journal
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988667241&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41411
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-41411
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-414112017-09-28T04:21:12Z Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wijarnpreecha K. Thongprayoon C. Panjawatanan P. Manatsathit W. Ungprasert P. Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Background/objectives Gallstone disease and its complications are common, particularly in Western populations. Recent studies have reported a significantly increased risk of gallstones among hepatitis C virus-infected patients. However, the data on patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are still limited. This meta-analysis was carried out with the aim of summarizing all available evidence. Patients and methods A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and the EMBASE database from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HBV-infected patients versus patients without HBV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse-variance method. Results Nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. We found no significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones, with a pooled OR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). The statistical heterogeneity was moderate, with an I 2 of 69%. Subgroup analysis was carried out. The pooled OR of cross-sectional studies was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91-1.12; I 2 0%), whereas the pooled OR of case-control studies was 1.53 (95% CI, 0.85-2.74; I 2 80%). Conclusion A significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones was not observed in this study. 2017-09-28T04:21:12Z 2017-09-28T04:21:12Z 2016-11-01 Journal 0954691X 2-s2.0-84988667241 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000754 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988667241&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41411
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Background/objectives Gallstone disease and its complications are common, particularly in Western populations. Recent studies have reported a significantly increased risk of gallstones among hepatitis C virus-infected patients. However, the data on patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are still limited. This meta-analysis was carried out with the aim of summarizing all available evidence. Patients and methods A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and the EMBASE database from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HBV-infected patients versus patients without HBV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse-variance method. Results Nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. We found no significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones, with a pooled OR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). The statistical heterogeneity was moderate, with an I 2 of 69%. Subgroup analysis was carried out. The pooled OR of cross-sectional studies was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91-1.12; I 2 0%), whereas the pooled OR of case-control studies was 1.53 (95% CI, 0.85-2.74; I 2 80%). Conclusion A significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones was not observed in this study.
format Journal
author Wijarnpreecha K.
Thongprayoon C.
Panjawatanan P.
Manatsathit W.
Ungprasert P.
spellingShingle Wijarnpreecha K.
Thongprayoon C.
Panjawatanan P.
Manatsathit W.
Ungprasert P.
Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
author_facet Wijarnpreecha K.
Thongprayoon C.
Panjawatanan P.
Manatsathit W.
Ungprasert P.
author_sort Wijarnpreecha K.
title Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort hepatitis b virus infection and risk of gallstones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988667241&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41411
_version_ 1681421997114916864