A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Accurate and precise knee flexion axis identification is critical for prescribing and assessing tibial and femoral derotation osteotomies, but is highly prone to marker misplacement-induced error. The purpose of this study was to develop an efficient algorithm for post-hoc corr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jensen E., Lugade V., Crenshaw J., Miller E., Kaufman K.
Format: Journal
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979489892&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41802
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-41802
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-418022017-09-28T04:23:26Z A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait Jensen E. Lugade V. Crenshaw J. Miller E. Kaufman K. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Accurate and precise knee flexion axis identification is critical for prescribing and assessing tibial and femoral derotation osteotomies, but is highly prone to marker misplacement-induced error. The purpose of this study was to develop an efficient algorithm for post-hoc correction of the knee flexion axis and test its efficacy relative to other established algorithms. Gait data were collected on twelve healthy subjects using standard marker placement as well as intentionally misplaced lateral knee markers. The efficacy of the algorithm was assessed by quantifying the reduction in knee angle errors. Crosstalk error was quantified from the coefficient of determination (r 2 ) between knee flexion and adduction angles. Mean rotation offset error (α o ) was quantified from the knee and hip rotation kinematics across the gait cycle. The principal component analysis (PCA)-based algorithm significantly reduced r 2 (p < 0.001) and caused α o,knee to converge toward 11.9±8.0° of external rotation, demonstrating improved certainty of the knee kinematics. The within-subject standard deviation of α o,hip between marker placements was reduced from 13.5±1.5° to 0.7±0.2° (p < 0.001), demonstrating improved precision of the knee kinematics. The PCA-based algorithm performed at levels comparable to a knee abduction-adduction minimization algorithm (Baker et al., 1999) and better than a null space algorithm (Schwartz and Rozumalski, 2005) for this healthy subject population. 2017-09-28T04:23:26Z 2017-09-28T04:23:26Z 2016-06-14 Journal 00219290 2-s2.0-84979489892 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.046 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979489892&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41802
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Accurate and precise knee flexion axis identification is critical for prescribing and assessing tibial and femoral derotation osteotomies, but is highly prone to marker misplacement-induced error. The purpose of this study was to develop an efficient algorithm for post-hoc correction of the knee flexion axis and test its efficacy relative to other established algorithms. Gait data were collected on twelve healthy subjects using standard marker placement as well as intentionally misplaced lateral knee markers. The efficacy of the algorithm was assessed by quantifying the reduction in knee angle errors. Crosstalk error was quantified from the coefficient of determination (r 2 ) between knee flexion and adduction angles. Mean rotation offset error (α o ) was quantified from the knee and hip rotation kinematics across the gait cycle. The principal component analysis (PCA)-based algorithm significantly reduced r 2 (p < 0.001) and caused α o,knee to converge toward 11.9±8.0° of external rotation, demonstrating improved certainty of the knee kinematics. The within-subject standard deviation of α o,hip between marker placements was reduced from 13.5±1.5° to 0.7±0.2° (p < 0.001), demonstrating improved precision of the knee kinematics. The PCA-based algorithm performed at levels comparable to a knee abduction-adduction minimization algorithm (Baker et al., 1999) and better than a null space algorithm (Schwartz and Rozumalski, 2005) for this healthy subject population.
format Journal
author Jensen E.
Lugade V.
Crenshaw J.
Miller E.
Kaufman K.
spellingShingle Jensen E.
Lugade V.
Crenshaw J.
Miller E.
Kaufman K.
A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait
author_facet Jensen E.
Lugade V.
Crenshaw J.
Miller E.
Kaufman K.
author_sort Jensen E.
title A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait
title_short A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait
title_full A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait
title_fullStr A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait
title_full_unstemmed A principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait
title_sort principal component analysis approach to correcting the knee flexion axis during gait
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979489892&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41802
_version_ 1681422069676376064