Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients

© 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Background and Aims Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has improved the diagnostic performance of cytology for the evaluation of malignant biliary strictures in the United States and Europe. The utility of FISH for the diagnosis of bilia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaiteerakij R., Barr Fritcher E., Angsuwatcharakon P., Ridtitid W., Chaithongrat S., Leerapun A., Baron T., Kipp B., Henry M., Halling K., Rerknimitr R., Roberts L.
Format: Journal
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84955260001&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41863
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-41863
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-418632017-09-28T04:23:47Z Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients Chaiteerakij R. Barr Fritcher E. Angsuwatcharakon P. Ridtitid W. Chaithongrat S. Leerapun A. Baron T. Kipp B. Henry M. Halling K. Rerknimitr R. Roberts L. © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Background and Aims Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has improved the diagnostic performance of cytology for the evaluation of malignant biliary strictures in the United States and Europe. The utility of FISH for the diagnosis of biliary strictures in Asia is currently unknown. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of FISH and conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures in Thai patients. Methods A prospective study was performed at 2 university hospitals between 2010 and 2013. Patients being evaluated for malignant-appearing biliary strictures were included (N = 99). Bile duct brushings were collected and assessed by cytology and FISH. Sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals of cytology and FISH were the main outcome measures. Results The overall sensitivities of cytology and FISH were 38% and 55%, respectively (P =.001). For those with a diagnosis of cancer based on clinical evidence without biopsy confirmation (n = 44), the sensitivities of cytology and FISH were 43% and 57%, respectively (P =.06). For the 49 patients for whom a cancer diagnosis was confirmed by pathology, FISH had a significantly higher sensitivity than cytology, with a sensitivity of 53% versus 33%, respectively (P =.008). Conclusions FISH improves the diagnostic performance of cytology and can be used as a complementary tool to bile duct brushing and biopsy for the evaluation of malignancy in biliary strictures in Asian populations. 2017-09-28T04:23:47Z 2017-09-28T04:23:47Z 2016-06-01 Journal 00165107 2-s2.0-84955260001 10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.037 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84955260001&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41863
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Background and Aims Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has improved the diagnostic performance of cytology for the evaluation of malignant biliary strictures in the United States and Europe. The utility of FISH for the diagnosis of biliary strictures in Asia is currently unknown. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of FISH and conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures in Thai patients. Methods A prospective study was performed at 2 university hospitals between 2010 and 2013. Patients being evaluated for malignant-appearing biliary strictures were included (N = 99). Bile duct brushings were collected and assessed by cytology and FISH. Sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals of cytology and FISH were the main outcome measures. Results The overall sensitivities of cytology and FISH were 38% and 55%, respectively (P =.001). For those with a diagnosis of cancer based on clinical evidence without biopsy confirmation (n = 44), the sensitivities of cytology and FISH were 43% and 57%, respectively (P =.06). For the 49 patients for whom a cancer diagnosis was confirmed by pathology, FISH had a significantly higher sensitivity than cytology, with a sensitivity of 53% versus 33%, respectively (P =.008). Conclusions FISH improves the diagnostic performance of cytology and can be used as a complementary tool to bile duct brushing and biopsy for the evaluation of malignancy in biliary strictures in Asian populations.
format Journal
author Chaiteerakij R.
Barr Fritcher E.
Angsuwatcharakon P.
Ridtitid W.
Chaithongrat S.
Leerapun A.
Baron T.
Kipp B.
Henry M.
Halling K.
Rerknimitr R.
Roberts L.
spellingShingle Chaiteerakij R.
Barr Fritcher E.
Angsuwatcharakon P.
Ridtitid W.
Chaithongrat S.
Leerapun A.
Baron T.
Kipp B.
Henry M.
Halling K.
Rerknimitr R.
Roberts L.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients
author_facet Chaiteerakij R.
Barr Fritcher E.
Angsuwatcharakon P.
Ridtitid W.
Chaithongrat S.
Leerapun A.
Baron T.
Kipp B.
Henry M.
Halling K.
Rerknimitr R.
Roberts L.
author_sort Chaiteerakij R.
title Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients
title_short Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients
title_full Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients
title_fullStr Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients
title_full_unstemmed Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients
title_sort fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in asian patients
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84955260001&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41863
_version_ 1681422081007288320