Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process

© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. In radiotherapy, medical linear accelerator (Linac) is the key system used for radiation treatments delivery. Although, recommissioning was recommended after major modification of the machine by AAPM TG53, but it might not be practical in radiotherapy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kadman B., Chawapun N., Ua-Apisitwong S., Asakit T., Chumpu N., Rueansri J.
Format: Journal
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971671284&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/42015
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-42015
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-420152017-09-28T04:24:46Z Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process Kadman B. Chawapun N. Ua-Apisitwong S. Asakit T. Chumpu N. Rueansri J. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. In radiotherapy, medical linear accelerator (Linac) is the key system used for radiation treatments delivery. Although, recommissioning was recommended after major modification of the machine by AAPM TG53, but it might not be practical in radiotherapy center with heavy workloads. The main purpose of this study was to compare photon beam physical data between initial commissioning and recommissioning of 6 MV Elekta Precise linac. The parameters for comparing were the percentage depth dose (PDD) and beam profiles. The clinical commissioning test cases followed IAEA-TECDOC-1583 were planned on REF 91230 IMRT Dose Verification Phantom by Philips' Pinnacle treatment planning system. The Delta 4PT was used for dose distribution verification with 90% passing criteria of the gamma index (3%/3mm). Our results revealed that the PDDs and beam profiles agreed within a tolerance limit recommended by TRS430. Most of the point doses and dose distribution verification passed the acceptance criteria. This study showed the consistency of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process. There was a good agreement between initial commissioning and recommissioning within a tolerance limit, demonstrated that the full recommissioning process might not be required. However, in the complex treatment planning geometry, the initial data should be applied with great caution. 2017-09-28T04:24:46Z 2017-09-28T04:24:46Z 2016-03-24 Journal 17426588 2-s2.0-84971671284 10.1088/1742-6596/694/1/012023 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971671284&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/42015
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. In radiotherapy, medical linear accelerator (Linac) is the key system used for radiation treatments delivery. Although, recommissioning was recommended after major modification of the machine by AAPM TG53, but it might not be practical in radiotherapy center with heavy workloads. The main purpose of this study was to compare photon beam physical data between initial commissioning and recommissioning of 6 MV Elekta Precise linac. The parameters for comparing were the percentage depth dose (PDD) and beam profiles. The clinical commissioning test cases followed IAEA-TECDOC-1583 were planned on REF 91230 IMRT Dose Verification Phantom by Philips' Pinnacle treatment planning system. The Delta 4PT was used for dose distribution verification with 90% passing criteria of the gamma index (3%/3mm). Our results revealed that the PDDs and beam profiles agreed within a tolerance limit recommended by TRS430. Most of the point doses and dose distribution verification passed the acceptance criteria. This study showed the consistency of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process. There was a good agreement between initial commissioning and recommissioning within a tolerance limit, demonstrated that the full recommissioning process might not be required. However, in the complex treatment planning geometry, the initial data should be applied with great caution.
format Journal
author Kadman B.
Chawapun N.
Ua-Apisitwong S.
Asakit T.
Chumpu N.
Rueansri J.
spellingShingle Kadman B.
Chawapun N.
Ua-Apisitwong S.
Asakit T.
Chumpu N.
Rueansri J.
Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process
author_facet Kadman B.
Chawapun N.
Ua-Apisitwong S.
Asakit T.
Chumpu N.
Rueansri J.
author_sort Kadman B.
title Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process
title_short Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process
title_full Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process
title_fullStr Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process
title_full_unstemmed Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process
title_sort consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971671284&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/42015
_version_ 1681422109443620864