Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations
© 2016 The Authors. This paper presents the comparison of back-flashover rate (BFR) by applying the CIGRE method and the IEEE-Flash software. The BFR on 230 kV single and double circuits transmission lines have been compared. Firstly, the BFR from the two iterative methods, CIGRE and the simplified...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Proceeding |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84999836734&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/42349 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
| id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-42349 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-423492017-09-28T04:26:37Z Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations Thanasaksiri T. © 2016 The Authors. This paper presents the comparison of back-flashover rate (BFR) by applying the CIGRE method and the IEEE-Flash software. The BFR on 230 kV single and double circuits transmission lines have been compared. Firstly, the BFR from the two iterative methods, CIGRE and the simplified methods, have been compared then the BFR using CIGRE method has been chosen in order to compare the results with the IEEE-Flash software. The IEEE-Flash software gives the BFR significantly higher than the CIGRE method for 230 kV double circuits but not for the single circuit. 2017-09-28T04:26:37Z 2017-09-28T04:26:37Z 2016-01-01 Conference Proceeding 2-s2.0-84999836734 10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.077 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84999836734&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/42349 |
| institution |
Chiang Mai University |
| building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
| country |
Thailand |
| collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
| description |
© 2016 The Authors. This paper presents the comparison of back-flashover rate (BFR) by applying the CIGRE method and the IEEE-Flash software. The BFR on 230 kV single and double circuits transmission lines have been compared. Firstly, the BFR from the two iterative methods, CIGRE and the simplified methods, have been compared then the BFR using CIGRE method has been chosen in order to compare the results with the IEEE-Flash software. The IEEE-Flash software gives the BFR significantly higher than the CIGRE method for 230 kV double circuits but not for the single circuit. |
| format |
Conference Proceeding |
| author |
Thanasaksiri T. |
| spellingShingle |
Thanasaksiri T. Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations |
| author_facet |
Thanasaksiri T. |
| author_sort |
Thanasaksiri T. |
| title |
Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations |
| title_short |
Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations |
| title_full |
Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of CIGRE Method and IEEE-Flash Software for Back-flashover Rate Calculations |
| title_sort |
comparison of cigre method and ieee-flash software for back-flashover rate calculations |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84999836734&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/42349 |
| _version_ |
1681422172624519168 |