Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling

Objectives-The purpose of this study was to compare success rates for depiction of the 5 typical transverse planes in the fetal upper thorax between cardiac- and body-based scrolling techniques. Methods-Spatiotemporal image correlation volume data sets acquired at the 4-chamber view level were obtai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jatavan T., Tongsong T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84890896118&partnerID=40&md5=a186874c17919e30320f7e7460f2553a
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/4276
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-4276
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-42762014-08-30T02:35:53Z Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling Jatavan T. Tongsong T. Objectives-The purpose of this study was to compare success rates for depiction of the 5 typical transverse planes in the fetal upper thorax between cardiac- and body-based scrolling techniques. Methods-Spatiotemporal image correlation volume data sets acquired at the 4-chamber view level were obtained from low-risk singleton pregnancies with healthy fetuses. Each data set was analyzed by the authors using both cardiac- and body-based techniques. With the cardiac-based technique, the exact 4-chamber view was first identified as an initial plane before scrolling, whereas with the body-based technique, a volume data set was first manipulated to get the fetal orientation in the exact dorsal supine position as an initial plane. In both techniques, the volumes were then scrolled through the upper thorax to identify the standard planes, including the 4-chamber, 5-chamber, 3-vessel, 3-vessel and trachea, and aortic arch views. Results-An analysis of 50 volume data sets to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver variability in the success rates for the 4-chamber, 5-chamber, 3-vessel, 3-vessel and trachea, and aortic arch views showed good agreement. In an analysis of 296 separate data sets, cardiac-based scrolling was associated with significantly higher success rates than body-based scrolling in all standard planes (P < .05). Conclusions-Cardiac-based scrolling resulted in higher success rates for obtaining the standard spatiotemporal image correlation planes than body-based scrolling. Therefore, examiners in the early part of the learning curve should be encouraged to first identify a perfect 4-chamber view at the start of an examination. © 2013 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014-08-30T02:35:53Z 2014-08-30T02:35:53Z 2013 Article 02784297 10.7863/ultra.32.12.2125 JUMED http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84890896118&partnerID=40&md5=a186874c17919e30320f7e7460f2553a http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/4276 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objectives-The purpose of this study was to compare success rates for depiction of the 5 typical transverse planes in the fetal upper thorax between cardiac- and body-based scrolling techniques. Methods-Spatiotemporal image correlation volume data sets acquired at the 4-chamber view level were obtained from low-risk singleton pregnancies with healthy fetuses. Each data set was analyzed by the authors using both cardiac- and body-based techniques. With the cardiac-based technique, the exact 4-chamber view was first identified as an initial plane before scrolling, whereas with the body-based technique, a volume data set was first manipulated to get the fetal orientation in the exact dorsal supine position as an initial plane. In both techniques, the volumes were then scrolled through the upper thorax to identify the standard planes, including the 4-chamber, 5-chamber, 3-vessel, 3-vessel and trachea, and aortic arch views. Results-An analysis of 50 volume data sets to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver variability in the success rates for the 4-chamber, 5-chamber, 3-vessel, 3-vessel and trachea, and aortic arch views showed good agreement. In an analysis of 296 separate data sets, cardiac-based scrolling was associated with significantly higher success rates than body-based scrolling in all standard planes (P < .05). Conclusions-Cardiac-based scrolling resulted in higher success rates for obtaining the standard spatiotemporal image correlation planes than body-based scrolling. Therefore, examiners in the early part of the learning curve should be encouraged to first identify a perfect 4-chamber view at the start of an examination. © 2013 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
format Article
author Jatavan T.
Tongsong T.
spellingShingle Jatavan T.
Tongsong T.
Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling
author_facet Jatavan T.
Tongsong T.
author_sort Jatavan T.
title Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling
title_short Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling
title_full Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling
title_fullStr Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling
title_sort comparison of fetal cardiac spatiotemporal image correlation segmental analysis between cardiac- and body-based scrolling
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84890896118&partnerID=40&md5=a186874c17919e30320f7e7460f2553a
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/4276
_version_ 1681420206698659840