Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable
Background: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should provide reliable evidence about the effects of interventions. This may be less reliable when only small trials are available. Methods: The sample size was determined for all surgical RCTs included in Cochrane Collaboration syste...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Rerkasem K., Rothwell P. |
---|---|
Format: | Journal |
Published: |
2017
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77949383761&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/43324 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
Similar Items
-
Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable
by: K. Rerkasem, et al.
Published: (2018) -
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis
by: Rerkasem K., et al.
Published: (2017) -
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure during carotid endarterectomy
by: Rerkasem K., et al.
Published: (2017) -
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy: An updated systematic review
by: Rerkasem K., et al.
Published: (2017) -
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis
by: Kittipan Rerkasem, et al.
Published: (2018)