Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms

© 2017 The Author(s). Background: To evaluate ocular biometric parameters in different subtypes of acute angle closure and compared to fellow eyes of AAC and PACS eyes. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review study. A total of 167 eyes (96 patients) consisting of 71 AAC eyes, 71 fellow eyes of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanin Suwan, Sunpong Jiamsawad, Apichat Tantraworasin, Lawrence Geyman, Wasu Supakontanasan, Chaiwat Teekhasaenee
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85037713789&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/43419
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-43419
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-434192018-04-25T07:34:30Z Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms Yanin Suwan Sunpong Jiamsawad Apichat Tantraworasin Lawrence Geyman Wasu Supakontanasan Chaiwat Teekhasaenee Agricultural and Biological Sciences Arts and Humanities © 2017 The Author(s). Background: To evaluate ocular biometric parameters in different subtypes of acute angle closure and compared to fellow eyes of AAC and PACS eyes. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review study. A total of 167 eyes (96 patients) consisting of 71 AAC eyes, 71 fellow eyes of AAC, and 25 PACS eyes were recruited. All patients underwent ocular examination and biometry. The mechanism of AAC was confirmed by ultrasound biomicroscopy. We then subdivided AAC eyes into four subgroups: crowded-angle (CR), lens subluxation (LS) pupillary block (PB), and plateau iris syndrome (PL). Outcome variables included anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), vitreal length (VL), axial length (AL), lens position and relative lens position (LP and RLP, respectively), and lens axial length factor (LAF). Results: Among the three groups, ACD was shallower in AAC eyes than fellow eyes of AAC and PACS eyes (p < 0.01 for both) and AAC eyes demonstrated a lesser LP and RLP. The LT, VL, AL, and LAF were not significantly different among the three groups. Among the four subgroups, LS displayed the most shallow ACD (p = 0.01). The lens position in PL was greater than in CR and LS (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: AAC eyes had a more anterior lens position than fellow eyes and PACS eyes, though lens thickness did not differ among the groups. As such, an anterior lens position may offer more sensitive prognostication regarding future development of AAC compared to lens thickness. 2018-01-24T03:45:39Z 2018-01-24T03:45:39Z 2017-12-11 Journal 14712415 2-s2.0-85037713789 10.1186/s12886-017-0635-8 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85037713789&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/43419
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Arts and Humanities
Yanin Suwan
Sunpong Jiamsawad
Apichat Tantraworasin
Lawrence Geyman
Wasu Supakontanasan
Chaiwat Teekhasaenee
Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms
description © 2017 The Author(s). Background: To evaluate ocular biometric parameters in different subtypes of acute angle closure and compared to fellow eyes of AAC and PACS eyes. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review study. A total of 167 eyes (96 patients) consisting of 71 AAC eyes, 71 fellow eyes of AAC, and 25 PACS eyes were recruited. All patients underwent ocular examination and biometry. The mechanism of AAC was confirmed by ultrasound biomicroscopy. We then subdivided AAC eyes into four subgroups: crowded-angle (CR), lens subluxation (LS) pupillary block (PB), and plateau iris syndrome (PL). Outcome variables included anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), vitreal length (VL), axial length (AL), lens position and relative lens position (LP and RLP, respectively), and lens axial length factor (LAF). Results: Among the three groups, ACD was shallower in AAC eyes than fellow eyes of AAC and PACS eyes (p < 0.01 for both) and AAC eyes demonstrated a lesser LP and RLP. The LT, VL, AL, and LAF were not significantly different among the three groups. Among the four subgroups, LS displayed the most shallow ACD (p = 0.01). The lens position in PL was greater than in CR and LS (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: AAC eyes had a more anterior lens position than fellow eyes and PACS eyes, though lens thickness did not differ among the groups. As such, an anterior lens position may offer more sensitive prognostication regarding future development of AAC compared to lens thickness.
format Journal
author Yanin Suwan
Sunpong Jiamsawad
Apichat Tantraworasin
Lawrence Geyman
Wasu Supakontanasan
Chaiwat Teekhasaenee
author_facet Yanin Suwan
Sunpong Jiamsawad
Apichat Tantraworasin
Lawrence Geyman
Wasu Supakontanasan
Chaiwat Teekhasaenee
author_sort Yanin Suwan
title Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms
title_short Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms
title_full Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms
title_fullStr Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms
title_sort qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85037713789&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/43419
_version_ 1681422369528217600