Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
© W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015. Objective: This review article summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence pertaining to temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) efficacy and mechanism of action in gliomas. Methods: Relevant publications published before June 2013 in PubMed database were...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84919342660&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/44466 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-44466 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-444662018-04-25T07:50:26Z Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas Danop Nanegrungsunk Wimrak Onchan Nipon Chattipakorn Siriporn C. Chattipakorn Agricultural and Biological Sciences © W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015. Objective: This review article summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence pertaining to temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) efficacy and mechanism of action in gliomas. Methods: Relevant publications published before June 2013 in PubMed database were reviewed. Results: Temozolomide and BEV are current chemotherapeutic agents treating patients with high-grade glioma, including glioblastoma. In vitro and in vivo studies have proposed discordant cell death pathways for TMZ as either apoptosis or autophagy using different experimental setting details or cell lines. In addition, BEV may cause cell death through hypoxia-induced autophagy or unspecific indirect effects on cancer cells. The complexity of cancer cells in glioma has contributed to their resistance of both chemotherapies. In clinical trials, overall survival duration in glioma patients with recurrence (8-9 months) is lower than that in newly diagnosed patients (12-15 months). Conclusion: Our collected data support the addition of radiotherapy, BEV, and other targeted agents to TMZ treatment, indicating prolonged survival duration in newly diagnosed patients. However, the optimal regimen for treating high-grade glioma cannot be concluded without more clinical trials. 2018-01-24T04:43:19Z 2018-01-24T04:43:19Z 2015-01-01 Journal 17431328 01616412 2-s2.0-84919342660 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000423 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84919342660&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/44466 |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
topic |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences Danop Nanegrungsunk Wimrak Onchan Nipon Chattipakorn Siriporn C. Chattipakorn Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas |
description |
© W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015. Objective: This review article summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence pertaining to temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) efficacy and mechanism of action in gliomas. Methods: Relevant publications published before June 2013 in PubMed database were reviewed. Results: Temozolomide and BEV are current chemotherapeutic agents treating patients with high-grade glioma, including glioblastoma. In vitro and in vivo studies have proposed discordant cell death pathways for TMZ as either apoptosis or autophagy using different experimental setting details or cell lines. In addition, BEV may cause cell death through hypoxia-induced autophagy or unspecific indirect effects on cancer cells. The complexity of cancer cells in glioma has contributed to their resistance of both chemotherapies. In clinical trials, overall survival duration in glioma patients with recurrence (8-9 months) is lower than that in newly diagnosed patients (12-15 months). Conclusion: Our collected data support the addition of radiotherapy, BEV, and other targeted agents to TMZ treatment, indicating prolonged survival duration in newly diagnosed patients. However, the optimal regimen for treating high-grade glioma cannot be concluded without more clinical trials. |
format |
Journal |
author |
Danop Nanegrungsunk Wimrak Onchan Nipon Chattipakorn Siriporn C. Chattipakorn |
author_facet |
Danop Nanegrungsunk Wimrak Onchan Nipon Chattipakorn Siriporn C. Chattipakorn |
author_sort |
Danop Nanegrungsunk |
title |
Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas |
title_short |
Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas |
title_full |
Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas |
title_fullStr |
Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas |
title_sort |
current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84919342660&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/44466 |
_version_ |
1681422564654579712 |