Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas

© W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015. Objective: This review article summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence pertaining to temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) efficacy and mechanism of action in gliomas. Methods: Relevant publications published before June 2013 in PubMed database were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danop Nanegrungsunk, Wimrak Onchan, Nipon Chattipakorn, Siriporn C. Chattipakorn
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84919342660&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/44466
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-44466
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-444662018-04-25T07:50:26Z Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas Danop Nanegrungsunk Wimrak Onchan Nipon Chattipakorn Siriporn C. Chattipakorn Agricultural and Biological Sciences © W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015. Objective: This review article summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence pertaining to temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) efficacy and mechanism of action in gliomas. Methods: Relevant publications published before June 2013 in PubMed database were reviewed. Results: Temozolomide and BEV are current chemotherapeutic agents treating patients with high-grade glioma, including glioblastoma. In vitro and in vivo studies have proposed discordant cell death pathways for TMZ as either apoptosis or autophagy using different experimental setting details or cell lines. In addition, BEV may cause cell death through hypoxia-induced autophagy or unspecific indirect effects on cancer cells. The complexity of cancer cells in glioma has contributed to their resistance of both chemotherapies. In clinical trials, overall survival duration in glioma patients with recurrence (8-9 months) is lower than that in newly diagnosed patients (12-15 months). Conclusion: Our collected data support the addition of radiotherapy, BEV, and other targeted agents to TMZ treatment, indicating prolonged survival duration in newly diagnosed patients. However, the optimal regimen for treating high-grade glioma cannot be concluded without more clinical trials. 2018-01-24T04:43:19Z 2018-01-24T04:43:19Z 2015-01-01 Journal 17431328 01616412 2-s2.0-84919342660 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000423 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84919342660&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/44466
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Agricultural and Biological Sciences
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Danop Nanegrungsunk
Wimrak Onchan
Nipon Chattipakorn
Siriporn C. Chattipakorn
Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
description © W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2015. Objective: This review article summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence pertaining to temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) efficacy and mechanism of action in gliomas. Methods: Relevant publications published before June 2013 in PubMed database were reviewed. Results: Temozolomide and BEV are current chemotherapeutic agents treating patients with high-grade glioma, including glioblastoma. In vitro and in vivo studies have proposed discordant cell death pathways for TMZ as either apoptosis or autophagy using different experimental setting details or cell lines. In addition, BEV may cause cell death through hypoxia-induced autophagy or unspecific indirect effects on cancer cells. The complexity of cancer cells in glioma has contributed to their resistance of both chemotherapies. In clinical trials, overall survival duration in glioma patients with recurrence (8-9 months) is lower than that in newly diagnosed patients (12-15 months). Conclusion: Our collected data support the addition of radiotherapy, BEV, and other targeted agents to TMZ treatment, indicating prolonged survival duration in newly diagnosed patients. However, the optimal regimen for treating high-grade glioma cannot be concluded without more clinical trials.
format Journal
author Danop Nanegrungsunk
Wimrak Onchan
Nipon Chattipakorn
Siriporn C. Chattipakorn
author_facet Danop Nanegrungsunk
Wimrak Onchan
Nipon Chattipakorn
Siriporn C. Chattipakorn
author_sort Danop Nanegrungsunk
title Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
title_short Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
title_full Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
title_fullStr Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
title_full_unstemmed Current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
title_sort current evidence of temozolomide and bevacizumab in treatment of gliomas
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84919342660&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/44466
_version_ 1681422564654579712