Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand

This article examines the relationship between rainfall-related events and trends, livelihood and food security and migration in rural upland communities in Thailand. This study was conducted as one of eight case studies within the framework of the 'Where the Rain Falls' Project. This arti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Sakdapolrak, Panomsak Promburom, Alexander Reif
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896119574&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45604
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-45604
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-456042018-01-24T06:13:04Z Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand Patrick Sakdapolrak Panomsak Promburom Alexander Reif This article examines the relationship between rainfall-related events and trends, livelihood and food security and migration in rural upland communities in Thailand. This study was conducted as one of eight case studies within the framework of the 'Where the Rain Falls' Project. This article is based on empirical research in four villages in the Province Lamphun, Northern Thailand. The households' livelihood in the research area is characterized by a high level of on and off-farm diversification and integration into national and global market structures. Migration - internal as well as international - is widespread. Based on the data gathered in a multi-method field-based research design, the study observed that while households are exposed to various rainfall related stressors, such as the extreme rainfall in 2011 which resulted in heavy floods in the Central Plains of Thailand, migration is not considered as a primary coping and risk mitigation strategy. Environmental factors are furthermore not the primary explanatory factor for pattern of mobility. The study highlights the complex relationship between environmental factors including rainfall and migration beyond determinism notions of environmental migration. This study points out that while migration might not be caused by rainfall-related events and trends, through migration induced translocal connectedness, the social resilience of exposed households and communities can be strengthened. © 2013 © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. 2018-01-24T06:13:04Z 2018-01-24T06:13:04Z 2014-01-01 Journal 17565537 17565529 2-s2.0-84896119574 10.1080/17565529.2013.826129 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896119574&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45604
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description This article examines the relationship between rainfall-related events and trends, livelihood and food security and migration in rural upland communities in Thailand. This study was conducted as one of eight case studies within the framework of the 'Where the Rain Falls' Project. This article is based on empirical research in four villages in the Province Lamphun, Northern Thailand. The households' livelihood in the research area is characterized by a high level of on and off-farm diversification and integration into national and global market structures. Migration - internal as well as international - is widespread. Based on the data gathered in a multi-method field-based research design, the study observed that while households are exposed to various rainfall related stressors, such as the extreme rainfall in 2011 which resulted in heavy floods in the Central Plains of Thailand, migration is not considered as a primary coping and risk mitigation strategy. Environmental factors are furthermore not the primary explanatory factor for pattern of mobility. The study highlights the complex relationship between environmental factors including rainfall and migration beyond determinism notions of environmental migration. This study points out that while migration might not be caused by rainfall-related events and trends, through migration induced translocal connectedness, the social resilience of exposed households and communities can be strengthened. © 2013 © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.
format Journal
author Patrick Sakdapolrak
Panomsak Promburom
Alexander Reif
spellingShingle Patrick Sakdapolrak
Panomsak Promburom
Alexander Reif
Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand
author_facet Patrick Sakdapolrak
Panomsak Promburom
Alexander Reif
author_sort Patrick Sakdapolrak
title Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand
title_short Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand
title_full Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand
title_fullStr Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? Empirical evidence from Northern Thailand
title_sort why successful in situ adaptation with environmental stress does not prevent people from migrating? empirical evidence from northern thailand
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896119574&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45604
_version_ 1681422776445960192