Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists

© 2014 Pongpruttipan et al. Background: Lymphomas are common malignancies that have various subtypes with many overlapping histologic, immunophenotypic and genetic features. Therefore, discordance in classifying lymphoma among pathologists may be encountered. But this issue is not well characterized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tawatchai Pongpruttipan, Sanya Sukpanichnant, Thamathorn Assanasen, Lertlakana Bhoopat, Kanita Kayasut, Wasana Kanoksil, Pongsak Wannakrairot
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908122983&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45789
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-45789
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-457892018-01-24T06:17:34Z Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists Tawatchai Pongpruttipan Sanya Sukpanichnant Thamathorn Assanasen Lertlakana Bhoopat Kanita Kayasut Wasana Kanoksil Pongsak Wannakrairot © 2014 Pongpruttipan et al. Background: Lymphomas are common malignancies that have various subtypes with many overlapping histologic, immunophenotypic and genetic features. Therefore, discordance in classifying lymphoma among pathologists may be encountered. But this issue is not well characterized. We conducted the present study to demonstrate discordances among Thai hematopathologists as well as to highlight common arguing points for classifying lymphomas.Methods: The 117 lymphoma cases were randomly retrieved and individually reviewed by 7 hematopathologists, members of the " Thai Hematopathologist Group," without knowing the original diagnoses. The consensus diagnoses were given from a discussion by all members. In each case, the diagnosis from each participant was compared with the consensus diagnosis and classified into 4 categories as follow: 1) concordance, 2) minor discordance, 3) major discordance and 4) serious discordance.Results: There were approximately 11% discordances between original and consensus diagnoses. The average discordances among all pathologists according to minor, major and serious discordances were 10%, 3.5% and 0.3%, respectively. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had the least discordance (7%). Small biopsies had been found to increase discordances in some lymphoma subtypes.Conclusions: The present study reveals some degrees of interobserver variation in classifying of lymphoma by using the 2008 WHO classification among hematopathologists. Some types of lymphomas on small biopsies were found to have a significant higher discordance rate. This study also described some common diagnostic discordances regarded as potential pitfalls in classifying lymphomas. 2018-01-24T06:17:34Z 2018-01-24T06:17:34Z 2014-01-01 Journal 17461596 2-s2.0-84908122983 10.1186/s13000-014-0162-3 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908122983&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45789
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2014 Pongpruttipan et al. Background: Lymphomas are common malignancies that have various subtypes with many overlapping histologic, immunophenotypic and genetic features. Therefore, discordance in classifying lymphoma among pathologists may be encountered. But this issue is not well characterized. We conducted the present study to demonstrate discordances among Thai hematopathologists as well as to highlight common arguing points for classifying lymphomas.Methods: The 117 lymphoma cases were randomly retrieved and individually reviewed by 7 hematopathologists, members of the " Thai Hematopathologist Group," without knowing the original diagnoses. The consensus diagnoses were given from a discussion by all members. In each case, the diagnosis from each participant was compared with the consensus diagnosis and classified into 4 categories as follow: 1) concordance, 2) minor discordance, 3) major discordance and 4) serious discordance.Results: There were approximately 11% discordances between original and consensus diagnoses. The average discordances among all pathologists according to minor, major and serious discordances were 10%, 3.5% and 0.3%, respectively. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had the least discordance (7%). Small biopsies had been found to increase discordances in some lymphoma subtypes.Conclusions: The present study reveals some degrees of interobserver variation in classifying of lymphoma by using the 2008 WHO classification among hematopathologists. Some types of lymphomas on small biopsies were found to have a significant higher discordance rate. This study also described some common diagnostic discordances regarded as potential pitfalls in classifying lymphomas.
format Journal
author Tawatchai Pongpruttipan
Sanya Sukpanichnant
Thamathorn Assanasen
Lertlakana Bhoopat
Kanita Kayasut
Wasana Kanoksil
Pongsak Wannakrairot
spellingShingle Tawatchai Pongpruttipan
Sanya Sukpanichnant
Thamathorn Assanasen
Lertlakana Bhoopat
Kanita Kayasut
Wasana Kanoksil
Pongsak Wannakrairot
Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists
author_facet Tawatchai Pongpruttipan
Sanya Sukpanichnant
Thamathorn Assanasen
Lertlakana Bhoopat
Kanita Kayasut
Wasana Kanoksil
Pongsak Wannakrairot
author_sort Tawatchai Pongpruttipan
title Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists
title_short Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists
title_full Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists
title_fullStr Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists
title_sort interobserver variation in classifying lymphomas among hematopathologists
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908122983&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45789
_version_ 1681422810664140800