Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

© 2014 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology. A possible causal relationship between sarcoidosis and malignancy has been the subject of debates for decades.To better understand this association,we conducteda systematic review and meta-analysisof cohort studies that reported relative risk, hazard rati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patompong Ungprasert, Narat Srivali, Karn Wijarnpreecha, Charat Thongprayoon, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Eric L. Knight
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908617330&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45792
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-45792
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-457922018-01-24T06:17:36Z Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis Patompong Ungprasert Narat Srivali Karn Wijarnpreecha Charat Thongprayoon Wisit Cheungpasitporn Eric L. Knight © 2014 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology. A possible causal relationship between sarcoidosis and malignancy has been the subject of debates for decades.To better understand this association,we conducteda systematic review and meta-analysisof cohort studies that reported relative risk, hazard ratio or standardized incidence ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) comparing the incidence of malignancy in patients with sarcoidosis versus non-sarcoidosis participants. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance methodology.Five studies were identified and included in our data analyses. The pooled RR of malignancy in patients with sarcoidosis was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.04-1.40). However, when we performed a sensitivity analysis that included only studies that compared the incidence of malignancy after the first year of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis with the incidence of malignancy after the first year of index date for non-sarcoidosis controls, the pooled risk ratio decreased and did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.97-1.32). Furthermore, analysis for publication bias has suggested that publication bias in favour of positive studies may be present.In conclusion,after accounting for possible detection bias and publication bias, there does not appear be a significant association between sarcoidosis and malignancy. 2018-01-24T06:17:36Z 2018-01-24T06:17:36Z 2014-01-01 Journal 14401843 13237799 2-s2.0-84908617330 10.1111/resp.12369 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908617330&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45792
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2014 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology. A possible causal relationship between sarcoidosis and malignancy has been the subject of debates for decades.To better understand this association,we conducteda systematic review and meta-analysisof cohort studies that reported relative risk, hazard ratio or standardized incidence ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) comparing the incidence of malignancy in patients with sarcoidosis versus non-sarcoidosis participants. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance methodology.Five studies were identified and included in our data analyses. The pooled RR of malignancy in patients with sarcoidosis was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.04-1.40). However, when we performed a sensitivity analysis that included only studies that compared the incidence of malignancy after the first year of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis with the incidence of malignancy after the first year of index date for non-sarcoidosis controls, the pooled risk ratio decreased and did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.97-1.32). Furthermore, analysis for publication bias has suggested that publication bias in favour of positive studies may be present.In conclusion,after accounting for possible detection bias and publication bias, there does not appear be a significant association between sarcoidosis and malignancy.
format Journal
author Patompong Ungprasert
Narat Srivali
Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Eric L. Knight
spellingShingle Patompong Ungprasert
Narat Srivali
Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Eric L. Knight
Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
author_facet Patompong Ungprasert
Narat Srivali
Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Eric L. Knight
author_sort Patompong Ungprasert
title Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? a systematic review and meta-analysis
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908617330&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45792
_version_ 1681422811214643200