Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient

This paper uses a refined soil gradient method to estimate soil CO2 efflux. Six different models are used to determine the relative gas diffusion coefficient (ξ). A weighted harmonic averaging is used to estimate the soil CO2 diffusion coefficient, yielding a better estimate of soil CO2 efflux. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pingintha N., Leclerc M.Y., Beasley J.P., Zhang G., Senthong C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77950466586&partnerID=40&md5=0afc24797adb019fb9ed2268f1b5fc78
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/458
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-458
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-4582014-08-29T07:31:48Z Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient Pingintha N. Leclerc M.Y. Beasley J.P. Zhang G. Senthong C. This paper uses a refined soil gradient method to estimate soil CO2 efflux. Six different models are used to determine the relative gas diffusion coefficient (ξ). A weighted harmonic averaging is used to estimate the soil CO2 diffusion coefficient, yielding a better estimate of soil CO2 efflux. The resulting soil CO2 efflux results are then compared to the soil CO2 efflux measured with a soil chamber. Depending on the choice of ξ model used, the estimated soil CO2 efflux using the gradient method reasonably approximates the efflux obtained using the soil chamber method. In addition, the estimated soil CO2 efflux obtained by this improved method is well described by an exponential function of soil temperature at a depth of 0.05 m with the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of 1.81 and a linear function of soil moisture at a depth of 0.12 m, in general agreement with previous findings. These results suggest that the gradient method is a practical cost-effective means to measure soil CO2 emissions. Results from the present study suggest that the gradient method can be used successfully to measure soil CO2 efflux provided that proper attention is paid to the judicious use of the proper diffusion coefficient. © 2009 The University of Georgia Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Munksgaard. 2014-08-29T07:31:48Z 2014-08-29T07:31:48Z 2010 Article 2806509 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00445.x http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77950466586&partnerID=40&md5=0afc24797adb019fb9ed2268f1b5fc78 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/458 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description This paper uses a refined soil gradient method to estimate soil CO2 efflux. Six different models are used to determine the relative gas diffusion coefficient (ξ). A weighted harmonic averaging is used to estimate the soil CO2 diffusion coefficient, yielding a better estimate of soil CO2 efflux. The resulting soil CO2 efflux results are then compared to the soil CO2 efflux measured with a soil chamber. Depending on the choice of ξ model used, the estimated soil CO2 efflux using the gradient method reasonably approximates the efflux obtained using the soil chamber method. In addition, the estimated soil CO2 efflux obtained by this improved method is well described by an exponential function of soil temperature at a depth of 0.05 m with the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of 1.81 and a linear function of soil moisture at a depth of 0.12 m, in general agreement with previous findings. These results suggest that the gradient method is a practical cost-effective means to measure soil CO2 emissions. Results from the present study suggest that the gradient method can be used successfully to measure soil CO2 efflux provided that proper attention is paid to the judicious use of the proper diffusion coefficient. © 2009 The University of Georgia Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Munksgaard.
format Article
author Pingintha N.
Leclerc M.Y.
Beasley J.P.
Zhang G.
Senthong C.
spellingShingle Pingintha N.
Leclerc M.Y.
Beasley J.P.
Zhang G.
Senthong C.
Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient
author_facet Pingintha N.
Leclerc M.Y.
Beasley J.P.
Zhang G.
Senthong C.
author_sort Pingintha N.
title Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient
title_short Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient
title_full Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient
title_fullStr Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: Comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient
title_sort assessment of the soil co2 gradient method for soil co2 efflux measurements: comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77950466586&partnerID=40&md5=0afc24797adb019fb9ed2268f1b5fc78
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/458
_version_ 1681419487004327936