การจัดการเรียนรู้โดยใช้ปัญหาเป็นฐานในชั้นเรียนคณิตศาสตร์เพื่อส่งเสริมคุณลักษณะอันพึงประสงค์ของเด็กไทยในประชาคม อาเซียน

The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of using problem-based learning provision in a mathematics classroom with the intent on promoting desirable characteristics of Thai children in ASEAN community. The target group was 39 students in MathayomSuksa 1/3 at the ChongfahSinseungwanic...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: นันทรัตน์ นวลมา
其他作者: ดวงหทัย กาศวิบูลย์
格式: Theses and Dissertations
語言:Thai
出版: เชียงใหม่ : บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ 2018
主題:
在線閱讀:http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45963
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Chiang Mai University
語言: Thai
實物特徵
總結:The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of using problem-based learning provision in a mathematics classroom with the intent on promoting desirable characteristics of Thai children in ASEAN community. The target group was 39 students in MathayomSuksa 1/3 at the ChongfahSinseungwanichbumrung School, Chiang Mai Province. The material used to gather data were lesson plans using problem-based learning approach (Application 1), the student behavior observation forms, an analytical thinking test, teacher’s daily notes, the students’ notes regarding their group work, and student’s learning assessment forms. Qualitative and quantitative analysis methods used to analyse the data. For qualitative data, descriptive analysis was used. For quantitative data, a statistics descriptive analysis was used. All data was analysed based on four characteristics of Thai children. These four characteristics are as follows; 1) appreciating human equality, 2) participation in discussion and the sharing of knowledge, 3) analytical thinking and 4) self management and control. The findings showed that using problem-based learning in a mathematics classroom could promote desirable characteristics of Thai children in all 4 characteristics. The average score for “appreciating human equality” was 3.39 at a good level. The average score for “participation in discussion and the sharing of knowledge” was 3.35 at a good level. The average score for “analytical thinking” was 2.89 at a good level. And the average score for “self management and control” was 3.22 at a good level.