The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday

© 2017, School of Science. The history of assigning ranks to fungi, as well as the relative importance of using divergence time estimates is reviewed. The paper pays tribute to the major mycological players, and especially to David Hawksworth on his 70th birthday and his contribution to fungal ranki...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin D. Hyde, Sajeewa S.N. Maharachchikumbura, Sinang Hongsanan, Milan C. Samarakoon, Robert Lücking, Dhandevi Pem, Dulanjalee Harishchandra, Rajesh Jeewon, Rui Lin Zhao, Jian Chu Xu, Jian Kui Liu, Abdullah M. Al-Sadi, Ali H. Bahkali, Abdallah M. Elgorban
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021265746&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46220
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-46220
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-462202018-04-25T07:25:05Z The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday Kevin D. Hyde Sajeewa S.N. Maharachchikumbura Sinang Hongsanan Milan C. Samarakoon Robert Lücking Dhandevi Pem Dulanjalee Harishchandra Rajesh Jeewon Rui Lin Zhao Jian Chu Xu Jian Kui Liu Abdullah M. Al-Sadi Ali H. Bahkali Abdallah M. Elgorban Environmental Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences © 2017, School of Science. The history of assigning ranks to fungi, as well as the relative importance of using divergence time estimates is reviewed. The paper pays tribute to the major mycological players, and especially to David Hawksworth on his 70th birthday and his contribution to fungal ranking in Systema Ascomycetum from 1982 to 1998. Following the conclusion of the latter series, the ranking continued with the Outlines of Ascomycota in 2007 and 2010 and more recently with specific classes in ‘Towards an outline of Sordariomycetes’ and ‘Families of Dothideomycetes’. Earlier classifications based on phenotype were certainly more subjective; however, remarkably many of these old arrangements have stood the test of time. More recently, phylogenetic analyses have provided evidence towards a natural classification, resulting in significant changes in many lineages. The classification arrangements however, are still subjective and dependent on the taxa analysed, resulting in different taxonomic interpretations and schemes, particularly when it comes to ranking. Thus, what have been considered as genera by some, have been introduced as families by others. More recently, estimation of divergence times using molecular clock methods have been used as objective evidence for higher ranking of taxa. A divergence period (i.e. 200–300 MYA) can be used as a criterion to infer when a group of related taxa evolved and what rank they should be given. We compiled data on divergence times for various higher ranking taxa in the Kingdom Fungi. The kingdom evolved 1000–1600 MYA (Stenian–Calymmian), while the presently accepted phyla evolved between 358 and 541 MYA (Devonian–Cambrian). Divergence times for subphyla are generally between 358 and 485 MYA (Devonian–Ordovician), those of classes 145–358 MYA (Jurassic–Carboniferous), subclasses 66–358 MYA (Cretaceous–Carboniferous), orders 23–252 MYA (Paleogene–Triassic), families 2.8–145 MYA (Neogene–Cretaceous), and genera 2.8–66 MYA (Neogene–Paleogene). Thus, there are wide discrepancies in the times different taxa diverged. We provide an overview over Ascomycota, showing how application of temporal banding could affect the recognition of higher taxa at certain rank levels. We then use Sordariomycetes as an example where we use divergence times to provide additional evidence to stabilize ranking of taxa below class level. We propose a series of evolutionary periods that could be used as a guide to determine the various higher ranks of fungi: phyla  > 550 MYA, subphyla 400–550 MYA; classes 300–400 MYA; subclasses 250–300 MYA, orders 150–250 MYA, and families 50–150 MYA. It is proposed that classification schemes and ranking of taxa should, where possible, incorporate a polyphasic approach including phylogeny, phenotype, and estimate of divergence times. 2018-04-25T06:51:36Z 2018-04-25T06:51:36Z 2017-05-01 Journal 18789129 15602745 2-s2.0-85021265746 10.1007/s13225-017-0383-3 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021265746&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46220
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Environmental Science
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
spellingShingle Environmental Science
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Kevin D. Hyde
Sajeewa S.N. Maharachchikumbura
Sinang Hongsanan
Milan C. Samarakoon
Robert Lücking
Dhandevi Pem
Dulanjalee Harishchandra
Rajesh Jeewon
Rui Lin Zhao
Jian Chu Xu
Jian Kui Liu
Abdullah M. Al-Sadi
Ali H. Bahkali
Abdallah M. Elgorban
The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday
description © 2017, School of Science. The history of assigning ranks to fungi, as well as the relative importance of using divergence time estimates is reviewed. The paper pays tribute to the major mycological players, and especially to David Hawksworth on his 70th birthday and his contribution to fungal ranking in Systema Ascomycetum from 1982 to 1998. Following the conclusion of the latter series, the ranking continued with the Outlines of Ascomycota in 2007 and 2010 and more recently with specific classes in ‘Towards an outline of Sordariomycetes’ and ‘Families of Dothideomycetes’. Earlier classifications based on phenotype were certainly more subjective; however, remarkably many of these old arrangements have stood the test of time. More recently, phylogenetic analyses have provided evidence towards a natural classification, resulting in significant changes in many lineages. The classification arrangements however, are still subjective and dependent on the taxa analysed, resulting in different taxonomic interpretations and schemes, particularly when it comes to ranking. Thus, what have been considered as genera by some, have been introduced as families by others. More recently, estimation of divergence times using molecular clock methods have been used as objective evidence for higher ranking of taxa. A divergence period (i.e. 200–300 MYA) can be used as a criterion to infer when a group of related taxa evolved and what rank they should be given. We compiled data on divergence times for various higher ranking taxa in the Kingdom Fungi. The kingdom evolved 1000–1600 MYA (Stenian–Calymmian), while the presently accepted phyla evolved between 358 and 541 MYA (Devonian–Cambrian). Divergence times for subphyla are generally between 358 and 485 MYA (Devonian–Ordovician), those of classes 145–358 MYA (Jurassic–Carboniferous), subclasses 66–358 MYA (Cretaceous–Carboniferous), orders 23–252 MYA (Paleogene–Triassic), families 2.8–145 MYA (Neogene–Cretaceous), and genera 2.8–66 MYA (Neogene–Paleogene). Thus, there are wide discrepancies in the times different taxa diverged. We provide an overview over Ascomycota, showing how application of temporal banding could affect the recognition of higher taxa at certain rank levels. We then use Sordariomycetes as an example where we use divergence times to provide additional evidence to stabilize ranking of taxa below class level. We propose a series of evolutionary periods that could be used as a guide to determine the various higher ranks of fungi: phyla  > 550 MYA, subphyla 400–550 MYA; classes 300–400 MYA; subclasses 250–300 MYA, orders 150–250 MYA, and families 50–150 MYA. It is proposed that classification schemes and ranking of taxa should, where possible, incorporate a polyphasic approach including phylogeny, phenotype, and estimate of divergence times.
format Journal
author Kevin D. Hyde
Sajeewa S.N. Maharachchikumbura
Sinang Hongsanan
Milan C. Samarakoon
Robert Lücking
Dhandevi Pem
Dulanjalee Harishchandra
Rajesh Jeewon
Rui Lin Zhao
Jian Chu Xu
Jian Kui Liu
Abdullah M. Al-Sadi
Ali H. Bahkali
Abdallah M. Elgorban
author_facet Kevin D. Hyde
Sajeewa S.N. Maharachchikumbura
Sinang Hongsanan
Milan C. Samarakoon
Robert Lücking
Dhandevi Pem
Dulanjalee Harishchandra
Rajesh Jeewon
Rui Lin Zhao
Jian Chu Xu
Jian Kui Liu
Abdullah M. Al-Sadi
Ali H. Bahkali
Abdallah M. Elgorban
author_sort Kevin D. Hyde
title The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday
title_short The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday
title_full The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday
title_fullStr The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday
title_full_unstemmed The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday
title_sort ranking of fungi: a tribute to david l. hawksworth on his 70th birthday
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021265746&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46220
_version_ 1681422833776852992