Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis

© 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons The submental island flap is useful as an alternative to microvascular free tissue transfer for the reconstruction of defects after resection of oral cancer because it is simple to harvest, reliable, and is associated with good oral f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Sittitrai, C. Srivanitchapoom, D. Reunmakkaew, K. Yata
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006893113&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46754
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-46754
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-467542018-04-25T07:25:53Z Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis P. Sittitrai C. Srivanitchapoom D. Reunmakkaew K. Yata Agricultural and Biological Sciences © 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons The submental island flap is useful as an alternative to microvascular free tissue transfer for the reconstruction of defects after resection of oral cancer because it is simple to harvest, reliable, and is associated with good oral function and low morbidity. However, because cancer of the oral cavity carries a risk of level I nodal metastases, the oncological safety of the flap remains controversial. Between April 2012 and September 2016, we studied patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who had surgical resection with submental island flap reconstruction for viability of the flap, signs of recurrence, and complications. Thirty-five patients (22 men and 13 women) were enrolled in the study and the mean (range) duration of follow-up was 23 (11-48) months. Six patients had local recurrences of their tumours, none of which was considered to be related to the flap. No flap was lost completely, but there were 10 cases of partial skin loss that healed with conservative management. There were no orocutaneous fistulas, haematomas, or marginal mandibular nerve palsies. We conclude that the submental island flap can be used safely in selected patients with level I lymph node metastases when the flap has been harvested meticulously. 2018-04-25T07:00:40Z 2018-04-25T07:00:40Z 2017-04-01 Journal 15321940 02664356 2-s2.0-85006893113 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.10.022 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006893113&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46754
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Agricultural and Biological Sciences
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Sciences
P. Sittitrai
C. Srivanitchapoom
D. Reunmakkaew
K. Yata
Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis
description © 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons The submental island flap is useful as an alternative to microvascular free tissue transfer for the reconstruction of defects after resection of oral cancer because it is simple to harvest, reliable, and is associated with good oral function and low morbidity. However, because cancer of the oral cavity carries a risk of level I nodal metastases, the oncological safety of the flap remains controversial. Between April 2012 and September 2016, we studied patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who had surgical resection with submental island flap reconstruction for viability of the flap, signs of recurrence, and complications. Thirty-five patients (22 men and 13 women) were enrolled in the study and the mean (range) duration of follow-up was 23 (11-48) months. Six patients had local recurrences of their tumours, none of which was considered to be related to the flap. No flap was lost completely, but there were 10 cases of partial skin loss that healed with conservative management. There were no orocutaneous fistulas, haematomas, or marginal mandibular nerve palsies. We conclude that the submental island flap can be used safely in selected patients with level I lymph node metastases when the flap has been harvested meticulously.
format Journal
author P. Sittitrai
C. Srivanitchapoom
D. Reunmakkaew
K. Yata
author_facet P. Sittitrai
C. Srivanitchapoom
D. Reunmakkaew
K. Yata
author_sort P. Sittitrai
title Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis
title_short Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis
title_full Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis
title_fullStr Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis
title_sort submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level i lymph node metastasis
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006893113&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46754
_version_ 1681422933079097344