Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts

© 2017 Elsevier B.V. Deepwater fold-thrust belts (DWFTBs) have been classified into three groups according to the present-day stress regime and tectonic setting. Near-field stress-driven DWFTBs are usually associated with passive margins. They are thin-skinned gravitational deformation with thick sa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosalind C. King, Chris K. Morley
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85008419273&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46778
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-46778
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-467782018-04-25T07:28:09Z Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts Rosalind C. King Chris K. Morley Agricultural and Biological Sciences © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Deepwater fold-thrust belts (DWFTBs) have been classified into three groups according to the present-day stress regime and tectonic setting. Near-field stress-driven DWFTBs are usually associated with passive margins. They are thin-skinned gravitational deformation with thick salt or overpressured shale detachments. DWFTBs formed by far-field stresses are primarily associated with continent convergent zones and active margins. Mixed near- and far-field stress-driven DWFTBs have aspects of both thin-skinned and thick-skinned tectonics. Detachment strength is the primary control on the first-order wedge geometry of a DWFTBs and is controlled by lithology and overpressure. Based on analysis of fault strength calculated from critical taper measurements it is found that detachments beneath different classes of DWFTBs are not analogously weak. Near-field stress-driven DWFTBs at passive margins generally have smaller wedge-taper angles and weaker detachments. Far-field stress-driven and mixed near- and far-field stress-driven DWFTBs at continent convergent zones or active margins generally have larger wedge-taper angles and stronger detachments. Differences in the way overpressures are generated, and dissipated between the different types of DWFTB are thought to be primarily responsible for the systemat ic variations in shale-prone basal detachment weakness found in this study. Clear lithology-related differences in DWFTB critical taper are shown between shale (higher taper) and salt (lower taper) dominated basal detachments. 2018-04-25T07:01:03Z 2018-04-25T07:01:03Z 2017-02-01 Journal 00128252 2-s2.0-85008419273 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.12.012 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85008419273&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46778
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Agricultural and Biological Sciences
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rosalind C. King
Chris K. Morley
Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts
description © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Deepwater fold-thrust belts (DWFTBs) have been classified into three groups according to the present-day stress regime and tectonic setting. Near-field stress-driven DWFTBs are usually associated with passive margins. They are thin-skinned gravitational deformation with thick salt or overpressured shale detachments. DWFTBs formed by far-field stresses are primarily associated with continent convergent zones and active margins. Mixed near- and far-field stress-driven DWFTBs have aspects of both thin-skinned and thick-skinned tectonics. Detachment strength is the primary control on the first-order wedge geometry of a DWFTBs and is controlled by lithology and overpressure. Based on analysis of fault strength calculated from critical taper measurements it is found that detachments beneath different classes of DWFTBs are not analogously weak. Near-field stress-driven DWFTBs at passive margins generally have smaller wedge-taper angles and weaker detachments. Far-field stress-driven and mixed near- and far-field stress-driven DWFTBs at continent convergent zones or active margins generally have larger wedge-taper angles and stronger detachments. Differences in the way overpressures are generated, and dissipated between the different types of DWFTB are thought to be primarily responsible for the systemat ic variations in shale-prone basal detachment weakness found in this study. Clear lithology-related differences in DWFTB critical taper are shown between shale (higher taper) and salt (lower taper) dominated basal detachments.
format Journal
author Rosalind C. King
Chris K. Morley
author_facet Rosalind C. King
Chris K. Morley
author_sort Rosalind C. King
title Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts
title_short Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts
title_full Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts
title_fullStr Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts
title_full_unstemmed Wedge Geometry and Detachment Strength in Deepwater Fold-Thrust Belts
title_sort wedge geometry and detachment strength in deepwater fold-thrust belts
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85008419273&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/46778
_version_ 1681422937578536960