Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture

© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Cephalosporins (CEFs) are antibiotics frequently used to treat bone infections and septic arthritis. The effects of CEFs on chondrocytes have not been studied until now. Cefazolin (cef1) and ceftriaxone (cef3), first-and third-generation CEFs, were selected to inve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Siengdee, W. Pradit, T. Euppayo, S. Chomdej, K. Nganvongpanit
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017382859&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-47021
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-470212018-04-25T07:34:38Z Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture P. Siengdee W. Pradit T. Euppayo S. Chomdej K. Nganvongpanit Agricultural and Biological Sciences Arts and Humanities © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Cephalosporins (CEFs) are antibiotics frequently used to treat bone infections and septic arthritis. The effects of CEFs on chondrocytes have not been studied until now. Cefazolin (cef1) and ceftriaxone (cef3), first-and third-generation CEFs, were selected to investigate their direct effects on normal and osteoarthritic (OA) primary canine chondrocytes, which were either nonstimulated or stimulated with the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β. In our results, treatment with CEFs increased the negative effects on both conditioned normal and OA chondrocytes, especially when applied to IL-1β-stimulated cells (inflammatory stimulus). CEFs significantly decreased cell viability and induced apoptotic cell death in both normal and OA chondrocytes; moreover, treatment with cef1 caused necrotic cell death in OA chondrocytes. Cef3 treatment could increase s-GAG synthesis in normal cells preincubated with IL-1β, while cef1 had no significant effect. The expression of TNF was clearly downregulated after cef3 treatments, whereas it was upregulated after cef1 treatments. However, cef3 induced stronger downregulation of TIMP1 and the extracellular matrix component genes COL2A1 and ACAN. In conclusion, these results suggest both the cytotoxic effects of CEFs and their adverse effects on chondrogenic marker genes at the transcriptional level, which provide additional insight into the clinical application of cef1 and cef3. 2018-04-25T07:12:49Z 2018-04-25T07:12:49Z 2017-12-01 Journal 13652885 01407783 2-s2.0-85017382859 10.1111/jvp.12401 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017382859&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47021
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Arts and Humanities
P. Siengdee
W. Pradit
T. Euppayo
S. Chomdej
K. Nganvongpanit
Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture
description © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Cephalosporins (CEFs) are antibiotics frequently used to treat bone infections and septic arthritis. The effects of CEFs on chondrocytes have not been studied until now. Cefazolin (cef1) and ceftriaxone (cef3), first-and third-generation CEFs, were selected to investigate their direct effects on normal and osteoarthritic (OA) primary canine chondrocytes, which were either nonstimulated or stimulated with the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β. In our results, treatment with CEFs increased the negative effects on both conditioned normal and OA chondrocytes, especially when applied to IL-1β-stimulated cells (inflammatory stimulus). CEFs significantly decreased cell viability and induced apoptotic cell death in both normal and OA chondrocytes; moreover, treatment with cef1 caused necrotic cell death in OA chondrocytes. Cef3 treatment could increase s-GAG synthesis in normal cells preincubated with IL-1β, while cef1 had no significant effect. The expression of TNF was clearly downregulated after cef3 treatments, whereas it was upregulated after cef1 treatments. However, cef3 induced stronger downregulation of TIMP1 and the extracellular matrix component genes COL2A1 and ACAN. In conclusion, these results suggest both the cytotoxic effects of CEFs and their adverse effects on chondrogenic marker genes at the transcriptional level, which provide additional insight into the clinical application of cef1 and cef3.
format Journal
author P. Siengdee
W. Pradit
T. Euppayo
S. Chomdej
K. Nganvongpanit
author_facet P. Siengdee
W. Pradit
T. Euppayo
S. Chomdej
K. Nganvongpanit
author_sort P. Siengdee
title Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture
title_short Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture
title_full Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture
title_sort comparison of the effects of cefazolin and ceftriaxone on canine chondrocyte culture
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017382859&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47021
_version_ 1681422983229341696