Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study

© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. Objective: To compare the surgeon's satisfaction during gynecological laparotomy surgery and patient's satisfaction as well as quality of life (QOL) among 3 groups of bowel preparations: no enema vs. sodium chloride enema vs. soap-suds enema (SSE). Materials and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wasakorn Suadee, Prapaporn Suprasert
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84975099861&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47174
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-47174
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-471742018-04-25T07:24:36Z Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study Wasakorn Suadee Prapaporn Suprasert © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. Objective: To compare the surgeon's satisfaction during gynecological laparotomy surgery and patient's satisfaction as well as quality of life (QOL) among 3 groups of bowel preparations: no enema vs. sodium chloride enema vs. soap-suds enema (SSE). Materials and Method: Three hundred and thirty three women undergoing gynecological laparotomy surgery and without risks to bowel lumen entry between November 2014 and October 2015 were randomized to receive no enema (n = 111), sodium chloride enema (n = 111) or SSE (n = 111) for bowel preparation. Surgeons, who were blinded for the type of bowel preparation, assessed the surgical visualization and the efficacy of bowel packing. The patients' satisfaction and the QOL were also assessed on the days of admission, operation, post-operation, and discharge. Results: The patients' features of the 3 groups were well balanced. The surgeon's satisfaction was rated excellent as 56.8, 63.1 and 65.8% in the no-enema, sodium chloride and SSE groups (p = 0.830), respectively. The patients in the no-bowel-preparation group were satisfied more significantly than the other groups (p = 0.001). No significant differences in QOL were observed among the 3 groups. Conclusion: The type of bowel preparation for exploratory gynecologic surgery did not affect the surgical visualization and the QOL of the patients. 2018-04-25T07:24:36Z 2018-04-25T07:24:36Z 2017-05-01 Journal 1423002X 03787346 2-s2.0-84975099861 10.1159/000446953 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84975099861&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47174
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. Objective: To compare the surgeon's satisfaction during gynecological laparotomy surgery and patient's satisfaction as well as quality of life (QOL) among 3 groups of bowel preparations: no enema vs. sodium chloride enema vs. soap-suds enema (SSE). Materials and Method: Three hundred and thirty three women undergoing gynecological laparotomy surgery and without risks to bowel lumen entry between November 2014 and October 2015 were randomized to receive no enema (n = 111), sodium chloride enema (n = 111) or SSE (n = 111) for bowel preparation. Surgeons, who were blinded for the type of bowel preparation, assessed the surgical visualization and the efficacy of bowel packing. The patients' satisfaction and the QOL were also assessed on the days of admission, operation, post-operation, and discharge. Results: The patients' features of the 3 groups were well balanced. The surgeon's satisfaction was rated excellent as 56.8, 63.1 and 65.8% in the no-enema, sodium chloride and SSE groups (p = 0.830), respectively. The patients in the no-bowel-preparation group were satisfied more significantly than the other groups (p = 0.001). No significant differences in QOL were observed among the 3 groups. Conclusion: The type of bowel preparation for exploratory gynecologic surgery did not affect the surgical visualization and the QOL of the patients.
format Journal
author Wasakorn Suadee
Prapaporn Suprasert
spellingShingle Wasakorn Suadee
Prapaporn Suprasert
Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study
author_facet Wasakorn Suadee
Prapaporn Suprasert
author_sort Wasakorn Suadee
title Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study
title_short Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study
title_full Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study
title_fullStr Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: A prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study
title_sort appropriate bowel preparation for laparotomy gynecologic surgery: a prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized study
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84975099861&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47174
_version_ 1681423011829252096