A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale

Though there are measures of forgiveness published in the behavioural science literature, very few scales are available to measure forgiveness in workplace relationships. The Workplace Forgiveness Scale aimed to measure forgiveness of a specific offense. Data from 348 professional nurses in Thailand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Itsara Boonyarit, Wiladlak Chuawanlee, Ann Macaskill, Numchai Supparerkchaisakul
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84878443169&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47973
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-47973
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-479732018-04-25T08:46:14Z A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale Itsara Boonyarit Wiladlak Chuawanlee Ann Macaskill Numchai Supparerkchaisakul Though there are measures of forgiveness published in the behavioural science literature, very few scales are available to measure forgiveness in workplace relationships. The Workplace Forgiveness Scale aimed to measure forgiveness of a specific offense. Data from 348 professional nurses in Thailand were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the psychometric properties of the scale were examined. Results from EFA suggested retaining four underlying factors of the forgiveness construct: Overcoming Negative Thought and Feeling toward the Offender, Seeking to Understand the Offender's Reasons, Fostering Positive Approaches towards the Offender, and Belief in the Benefits of Forgiveness. Reliability coefficients for the total scale and subscales were adequate. Evidence of construct validity is presented. Scores on the forgiveness scale were positively associated with other related forgiveness constructs. Nomological validity analysis supported the theoretical networks of the forgiveness construct. Forgiveness played the complete mediating role in the relationship between dispositional forgiveness and willingness to reconcile, and played a partial mediating role in the relationship between rumination and seeking to revenge the offender. Bootstrap analysis on the parameter estimates of the sample results revealed satisfactory level of internal replicability and stability of the results across the samples. Implications for future research are discussed. 2018-04-25T08:46:14Z 2018-04-25T08:46:14Z 2013-05-01 Journal 18410413 2-s2.0-84878443169 10.5964/ejop.v9i2.551 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84878443169&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47973
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description Though there are measures of forgiveness published in the behavioural science literature, very few scales are available to measure forgiveness in workplace relationships. The Workplace Forgiveness Scale aimed to measure forgiveness of a specific offense. Data from 348 professional nurses in Thailand were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the psychometric properties of the scale were examined. Results from EFA suggested retaining four underlying factors of the forgiveness construct: Overcoming Negative Thought and Feeling toward the Offender, Seeking to Understand the Offender's Reasons, Fostering Positive Approaches towards the Offender, and Belief in the Benefits of Forgiveness. Reliability coefficients for the total scale and subscales were adequate. Evidence of construct validity is presented. Scores on the forgiveness scale were positively associated with other related forgiveness constructs. Nomological validity analysis supported the theoretical networks of the forgiveness construct. Forgiveness played the complete mediating role in the relationship between dispositional forgiveness and willingness to reconcile, and played a partial mediating role in the relationship between rumination and seeking to revenge the offender. Bootstrap analysis on the parameter estimates of the sample results revealed satisfactory level of internal replicability and stability of the results across the samples. Implications for future research are discussed.
format Journal
author Itsara Boonyarit
Wiladlak Chuawanlee
Ann Macaskill
Numchai Supparerkchaisakul
spellingShingle Itsara Boonyarit
Wiladlak Chuawanlee
Ann Macaskill
Numchai Supparerkchaisakul
A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale
author_facet Itsara Boonyarit
Wiladlak Chuawanlee
Ann Macaskill
Numchai Supparerkchaisakul
author_sort Itsara Boonyarit
title A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale
title_short A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale
title_full A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale
title_fullStr A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale
title_full_unstemmed A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale
title_sort psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84878443169&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/47973
_version_ 1681423163076902912