Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand

Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was applied to the treatment of two different categories from 100 cases that had been collected over a 5year period (2007-2011). These categories were allocated into groups by size of toxic substances, which were classified as two different kinds of diseases....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dusit Lumlertgul, Yuttitham Suteeka, Supaluck Tumpong, Derek Bunnachak, Suchada Boonkaew
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873465960&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/48118
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-48118
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-481182018-04-25T08:47:53Z Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand Dusit Lumlertgul Yuttitham Suteeka Supaluck Tumpong Derek Bunnachak Suchada Boonkaew Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was applied to the treatment of two different categories from 100 cases that had been collected over a 5year period (2007-2011). These categories were allocated into groups by size of toxic substances, which were classified as two different kinds of diseases. Group I comprised diseases that were caused by alloimmunity in transplantation, autoimmune diseases, complicated nephrotic syndrome, pure red cell aplasia, and toxemia of pregnancy. This group was treated with a plasma separator (plasmaflow-05, Asahi Kasei) and plasma fractionators, EC-20W. The second group, which included hyperviscosity syndrome, was treated by the same plasma separator, but with different plasma fractionators using EC-40W. This group included diabetes nephropathy, hyperlipidemia, peripheral arterial diseases, and neurosensory hearing loss. Both groups used 1.5 plasma volumes in each treatment for three sessions in two consecutive weeks. The result of treatment in group I showed that plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) was decreased substantially by 66% in either transplant or lupus nephritis patients after the third session. In the second group, IgM, fibrinogen, and lipid markedly responded to the treatment. Two diabetes nephropathy patients showed stable renal function for more than 12months. Peripheral arterial disease was shown to benefit from significantly decreasing fibrinogen and IgM, which resulted in clinical tissue oxygenation. Neither bleeding diathesis nor membrane anaphylaxis were reported from the treatment. In summary, apheresis patients were shown to benefit in hypersensitized and hyperviscosity syndrome. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis © 2012 International Society for Apheresis. 2018-04-25T08:47:53Z 2018-04-25T08:47:53Z 2013-02-01 Journal 17449987 17449979 2-s2.0-84873465960 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2012.01105.x https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873465960&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/48118
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was applied to the treatment of two different categories from 100 cases that had been collected over a 5year period (2007-2011). These categories were allocated into groups by size of toxic substances, which were classified as two different kinds of diseases. Group I comprised diseases that were caused by alloimmunity in transplantation, autoimmune diseases, complicated nephrotic syndrome, pure red cell aplasia, and toxemia of pregnancy. This group was treated with a plasma separator (plasmaflow-05, Asahi Kasei) and plasma fractionators, EC-20W. The second group, which included hyperviscosity syndrome, was treated by the same plasma separator, but with different plasma fractionators using EC-40W. This group included diabetes nephropathy, hyperlipidemia, peripheral arterial diseases, and neurosensory hearing loss. Both groups used 1.5 plasma volumes in each treatment for three sessions in two consecutive weeks. The result of treatment in group I showed that plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) was decreased substantially by 66% in either transplant or lupus nephritis patients after the third session. In the second group, IgM, fibrinogen, and lipid markedly responded to the treatment. Two diabetes nephropathy patients showed stable renal function for more than 12months. Peripheral arterial disease was shown to benefit from significantly decreasing fibrinogen and IgM, which resulted in clinical tissue oxygenation. Neither bleeding diathesis nor membrane anaphylaxis were reported from the treatment. In summary, apheresis patients were shown to benefit in hypersensitized and hyperviscosity syndrome. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis © 2012 International Society for Apheresis.
format Journal
author Dusit Lumlertgul
Yuttitham Suteeka
Supaluck Tumpong
Derek Bunnachak
Suchada Boonkaew
spellingShingle Dusit Lumlertgul
Yuttitham Suteeka
Supaluck Tumpong
Derek Bunnachak
Suchada Boonkaew
Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand
author_facet Dusit Lumlertgul
Yuttitham Suteeka
Supaluck Tumpong
Derek Bunnachak
Suchada Boonkaew
author_sort Dusit Lumlertgul
title Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand
title_short Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand
title_full Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand
title_fullStr Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in Different Diseases in Thailand
title_sort double filtration plasmapheresis in different diseases in thailand
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873465960&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/48118
_version_ 1681423190297935872