A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task

© 2018 Elsevier Inc. The authors examined the association between working memory and response inhibition on the Stroop task using a cross-sectional, international sample of 5099 individuals (49.3% male) ages 10–30 (M = 17.04 years; SD = 5.9). Response inhibition was measured using a Stroop task that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natasha Duell, Grace Icenogle, Karol Silva, Jason Chein, Laurence Steinberg, Marie T. Banich, Laura Di Guinta, Kenneth A. Dodge, Kostas A. Fanti, Jennifer E. Lansford, Paul Oburu, Concetta Pastorelli, Ann T. Skinner, Emma Sorbring, Sombat Tapanya, Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado, Liane Peña Alampay, Suha M. Al-Hassan, Hanan M.S. Takash, Dario Bacchini, Lei Chang, Nandita Chaudhary
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042715504&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/48370
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-48370
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-483702018-04-25T10:11:33Z A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task Natasha Duell Grace Icenogle Karol Silva Jason Chein Laurence Steinberg Marie T. Banich Laura Di Guinta Kenneth A. Dodge Kostas A. Fanti Jennifer E. Lansford Paul Oburu Concetta Pastorelli Ann T. Skinner Emma Sorbring Sombat Tapanya Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado Liane Peña Alampay Suha M. Al-Hassan Hanan M.S. Takash Dario Bacchini Lei Chang Nandita Chaudhary © 2018 Elsevier Inc. The authors examined the association between working memory and response inhibition on the Stroop task using a cross-sectional, international sample of 5099 individuals (49.3% male) ages 10–30 (M = 17.04 years; SD = 5.9). Response inhibition was measured using a Stroop task that included “equal” and “unequal” blocks, during which the relative frequency of neutral and incongruent trials was manipulated. Competing stimuli in incongruent trials evinced inhibitory functioning, and having a lower proportion of incongruent trials (as in unequal blocks) placed higher demands on working memory. Results for accuracy indicated that age and working memory were independently associated with response inhibition. Age differences in response inhibition followed a curvilinear trajectory, with performance improving into early adulthood. Response inhibition was greatest among individuals with high working memory. For response time, age uniquely predicted response inhibition in unequal blocks. In equal blocks, age differences in response inhibition varied as a function of working memory, with age differences being least pronounced among individuals with high working memory. The implications of considering the association between response inhibition and working memory in the context of development are discussed. 2018-04-25T10:11:33Z 2018-04-25T10:11:33Z 2018-07-01 Journal 08852014 2-s2.0-85042715504 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.02.003 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042715504&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/48370
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
description © 2018 Elsevier Inc. The authors examined the association between working memory and response inhibition on the Stroop task using a cross-sectional, international sample of 5099 individuals (49.3% male) ages 10–30 (M = 17.04 years; SD = 5.9). Response inhibition was measured using a Stroop task that included “equal” and “unequal” blocks, during which the relative frequency of neutral and incongruent trials was manipulated. Competing stimuli in incongruent trials evinced inhibitory functioning, and having a lower proportion of incongruent trials (as in unequal blocks) placed higher demands on working memory. Results for accuracy indicated that age and working memory were independently associated with response inhibition. Age differences in response inhibition followed a curvilinear trajectory, with performance improving into early adulthood. Response inhibition was greatest among individuals with high working memory. For response time, age uniquely predicted response inhibition in unequal blocks. In equal blocks, age differences in response inhibition varied as a function of working memory, with age differences being least pronounced among individuals with high working memory. The implications of considering the association between response inhibition and working memory in the context of development are discussed.
format Journal
author Natasha Duell
Grace Icenogle
Karol Silva
Jason Chein
Laurence Steinberg
Marie T. Banich
Laura Di Guinta
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kostas A. Fanti
Jennifer E. Lansford
Paul Oburu
Concetta Pastorelli
Ann T. Skinner
Emma Sorbring
Sombat Tapanya
Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado
Liane Peña Alampay
Suha M. Al-Hassan
Hanan M.S. Takash
Dario Bacchini
Lei Chang
Nandita Chaudhary
spellingShingle Natasha Duell
Grace Icenogle
Karol Silva
Jason Chein
Laurence Steinberg
Marie T. Banich
Laura Di Guinta
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kostas A. Fanti
Jennifer E. Lansford
Paul Oburu
Concetta Pastorelli
Ann T. Skinner
Emma Sorbring
Sombat Tapanya
Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado
Liane Peña Alampay
Suha M. Al-Hassan
Hanan M.S. Takash
Dario Bacchini
Lei Chang
Nandita Chaudhary
A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task
author_facet Natasha Duell
Grace Icenogle
Karol Silva
Jason Chein
Laurence Steinberg
Marie T. Banich
Laura Di Guinta
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kostas A. Fanti
Jennifer E. Lansford
Paul Oburu
Concetta Pastorelli
Ann T. Skinner
Emma Sorbring
Sombat Tapanya
Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado
Liane Peña Alampay
Suha M. Al-Hassan
Hanan M.S. Takash
Dario Bacchini
Lei Chang
Nandita Chaudhary
author_sort Natasha Duell
title A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task
title_short A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task
title_full A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task
title_fullStr A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the Stroop task
title_sort cross-sectional examination of response inhibition and working memory on the stroop task
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042715504&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/48370
_version_ 1681423236542234624