How sexual objectification generates dehumanization in western and eastern cultures: A comparison between belgiumand Thailand
© 2018 Hogrefe. Ever since Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) proposed objectification theory, research on self-objectification and - by extension - other-objectification has experienced a considerable expansion. However, most of the studies on sexual objectification have been conducted solely in Wester...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85043363932&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/48426 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
| Summary: | © 2018 Hogrefe. Ever since Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) proposed objectification theory, research on self-objectification and - by extension - other-objectification has experienced a considerable expansion. However, most of the studies on sexual objectification have been conducted solely in Western populations. This study investigates whether the effect of target sexualization on social perception differs as a function of culture (Western vs. Eastern). Specifically, we asked a Western sample (Belgian, N = 62) and a Southeast Asian sample (Thai, N = 98) to rate sexualized versus nonsexualized targets.Wefound that sexual objectification results in dehumanization in both Western (Belgium) and Eastern (Thailand) cultures. Specifically, participants from both countries attributed less competence and less agency to sexualized than to nonsexualized targets, and they reported that they would administer more intense pain to sexualized than to nonsexualized targets. Thus, building on past research, this study suggests that the effect of target sexualization on dehumanization is amore general rather than a culture-specific phenomenon. |
|---|