Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer

Aim: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a more costly chemotherapy regimen than cisplatin plus etoposide; however there have been reports of higher efficacy and less toxicity of this regimen. Thus, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of these two chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumitra Thongprasert, Unchalee Permsuwan, Chidchanok Ruengorn, Chaiyut Charoentum, Busyamas Chewaskulyong
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=83355175819&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50141
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-50141
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-501412018-09-04T04:25:07Z Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer Sumitra Thongprasert Unchalee Permsuwan Chidchanok Ruengorn Chaiyut Charoentum Busyamas Chewaskulyong Medicine Aim: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a more costly chemotherapy regimen than cisplatin plus etoposide; however there have been reports of higher efficacy and less toxicity of this regimen. Thus, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of these two chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Using the perspective of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, direct medical costs, including chemotherapy, drugs, medical service charges, costs of adverse events, concomitant medication and survival time were directly gathered from 65 patients enrolled from August 2005 to November 2008. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was also calculated. Results: Of these 65 patients, 30 received cisplatin plus etoposide (Arm I) and 35 received carboplatin plus paclitaxel (Arm II). The median survival time was not statistically significant (8.23months vs 8.80months in Arm I and II, respectively; P=0.99). The total cost per patient in Arm II was about three times that in Arm I (95,548 Baht vs 29,692 Baht) while quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) in Arm II were slightly above those in Arm I (0.587 vs 0.412). The ICER was equal to 375,958 Baht per QALY. Conclusion: With a cost-effectiveness threshold of 100,000 Baht in Thailand, carboplatin plus paclitaxel was still not cost-effective. While the selection of a suitable regimen for individual patients should not rely on drug and hospital costs alone, the overall cost, including the burden on patients, should be taken into consideration. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. 2018-09-04T04:25:07Z 2018-09-04T04:25:07Z 2011-12-01 Journal 17437563 17437555 2-s2.0-83355175819 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01463.x https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=83355175819&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50141
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Sumitra Thongprasert
Unchalee Permsuwan
Chidchanok Ruengorn
Chaiyut Charoentum
Busyamas Chewaskulyong
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer
description Aim: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a more costly chemotherapy regimen than cisplatin plus etoposide; however there have been reports of higher efficacy and less toxicity of this regimen. Thus, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of these two chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Using the perspective of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, direct medical costs, including chemotherapy, drugs, medical service charges, costs of adverse events, concomitant medication and survival time were directly gathered from 65 patients enrolled from August 2005 to November 2008. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was also calculated. Results: Of these 65 patients, 30 received cisplatin plus etoposide (Arm I) and 35 received carboplatin plus paclitaxel (Arm II). The median survival time was not statistically significant (8.23months vs 8.80months in Arm I and II, respectively; P=0.99). The total cost per patient in Arm II was about three times that in Arm I (95,548 Baht vs 29,692 Baht) while quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) in Arm II were slightly above those in Arm I (0.587 vs 0.412). The ICER was equal to 375,958 Baht per QALY. Conclusion: With a cost-effectiveness threshold of 100,000 Baht in Thailand, carboplatin plus paclitaxel was still not cost-effective. While the selection of a suitable regimen for individual patients should not rely on drug and hospital costs alone, the overall cost, including the burden on patients, should be taken into consideration. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
format Journal
author Sumitra Thongprasert
Unchalee Permsuwan
Chidchanok Ruengorn
Chaiyut Charoentum
Busyamas Chewaskulyong
author_facet Sumitra Thongprasert
Unchalee Permsuwan
Chidchanok Ruengorn
Chaiyut Charoentum
Busyamas Chewaskulyong
author_sort Sumitra Thongprasert
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase iii randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=83355175819&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50141
_version_ 1681423536431824896