An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia

Aims: To compare the relative efficacy of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (BevCG) with cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP) in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients. In the absence of evidence from head-to-head trial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Wen Cheng Chang, Sumitra Thongprasert, Elaine Wright, Kenneth Tsang, Heung Tae Kim, Myung Ju Ahn, Joo Hang Kim, Jin Hyoung Kang, Sang We Kim, Stefan Walzer
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79956069755&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50230
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-50230
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-502302018-09-04T04:26:53Z An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia John Wen Cheng Chang Sumitra Thongprasert Elaine Wright Kenneth Tsang Heung Tae Kim Myung Ju Ahn Joo Hang Kim Jin Hyoung Kang Sang We Kim Stefan Walzer Medicine Aims: To compare the relative efficacy of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (BevCG) with cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP) in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients. In the absence of evidence from head-to-head trials, an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was selected to compare these treatments. Methods: BevCG and CP treatments have been compared in their relative effects versus their common comparator, the CG treatment. Outcomes from the ITC were used in a statistical model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the two treatments. The non-proportional hazards log-logistic, accelerated failure time model was selected as it provided the best fit. The ITC hazard ratio (HR) was conservatively adjusted to match what was observed between the cumulative hazard functions until the end of the Avastin in Lung trial follow-up period. Results: The ITC analysis suggests that patients treated with Bev-based treatment can expect more favorable outcomes in terms of both PFS and OS (PFS HR=0.71 and OS HR=0.41). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses of PFS and OS HR showed that HR values below 1 are likely to occur in 82% of patients for PFS HR and in 94% of patients for OS HR. Conclusion: BevCG can be considered a more effective therapy than CP for NSCLC patients in East Asia. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. 2018-09-04T04:26:53Z 2018-09-04T04:26:53Z 2011-06-01 Journal 17437563 17437555 2-s2.0-79956069755 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01398.x https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79956069755&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50230
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
John Wen Cheng Chang
Sumitra Thongprasert
Elaine Wright
Kenneth Tsang
Heung Tae Kim
Myung Ju Ahn
Joo Hang Kim
Jin Hyoung Kang
Sang We Kim
Stefan Walzer
An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
description Aims: To compare the relative efficacy of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (BevCG) with cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP) in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients. In the absence of evidence from head-to-head trials, an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was selected to compare these treatments. Methods: BevCG and CP treatments have been compared in their relative effects versus their common comparator, the CG treatment. Outcomes from the ITC were used in a statistical model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the two treatments. The non-proportional hazards log-logistic, accelerated failure time model was selected as it provided the best fit. The ITC hazard ratio (HR) was conservatively adjusted to match what was observed between the cumulative hazard functions until the end of the Avastin in Lung trial follow-up period. Results: The ITC analysis suggests that patients treated with Bev-based treatment can expect more favorable outcomes in terms of both PFS and OS (PFS HR=0.71 and OS HR=0.41). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses of PFS and OS HR showed that HR values below 1 are likely to occur in 82% of patients for PFS HR and in 94% of patients for OS HR. Conclusion: BevCG can be considered a more effective therapy than CP for NSCLC patients in East Asia. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
format Journal
author John Wen Cheng Chang
Sumitra Thongprasert
Elaine Wright
Kenneth Tsang
Heung Tae Kim
Myung Ju Ahn
Joo Hang Kim
Jin Hyoung Kang
Sang We Kim
Stefan Walzer
author_facet John Wen Cheng Chang
Sumitra Thongprasert
Elaine Wright
Kenneth Tsang
Heung Tae Kim
Myung Ju Ahn
Joo Hang Kim
Jin Hyoung Kang
Sang We Kim
Stefan Walzer
author_sort John Wen Cheng Chang
title An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_short An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_full An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_fullStr An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_full_unstemmed An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_sort indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in east asia
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79956069755&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50230
_version_ 1681423552351305728