Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison

Peroxidases (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are enzymes that are well known to be involved in the enzymatic browning reaction of fruits and vegetables with different catalytic mechanisms. Both enzymes have some common substrates, but each also has its specific substrates. In our computational stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prontipa Nokthai, Vannajan Sanghiran Lee, Lalida Shank
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958530134&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50543
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-50543
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-505432018-09-04T04:44:37Z Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison Prontipa Nokthai Vannajan Sanghiran Lee Lalida Shank Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering Chemistry Computer Science Peroxidases (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are enzymes that are well known to be involved in the enzymatic browning reaction of fruits and vegetables with different catalytic mechanisms. Both enzymes have some common substrates, but each also has its specific substrates. In our computational study, the amino acid sequence of grape peroxidase (ABX) was used for the construction of models employing homology modeling method based on the X-ray structure of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase from pea (PDB ID:1APX), whereas the model of grape polyphenol oxidase was obtained directly from the available X-ray structure (PDB ID:2P3X). Molecular docking of common substrates of these two enzymes was subsequently studied. It was found that epicatechin and catechin exhibited high affinity with both enzymes, even though POD and PPO have different binding pockets regarding the size and the key amino acids involved in binding. Predicted binding modes of substrates with both enzymes were also compared. The calculated docking interaction energy of trihydroxybenzoic acid related compounds shows high affinity, suggesting specificity and potential use as common inhibitor to grape ascorbate peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. © 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2018-09-04T04:42:08Z 2018-09-04T04:42:08Z 2010-09-01 Journal 14220067 2-s2.0-77958530134 10.3390/ijms11093266 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958530134&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50543
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
Computer Science
spellingShingle Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
Computer Science
Prontipa Nokthai
Vannajan Sanghiran Lee
Lalida Shank
Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison
description Peroxidases (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are enzymes that are well known to be involved in the enzymatic browning reaction of fruits and vegetables with different catalytic mechanisms. Both enzymes have some common substrates, but each also has its specific substrates. In our computational study, the amino acid sequence of grape peroxidase (ABX) was used for the construction of models employing homology modeling method based on the X-ray structure of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase from pea (PDB ID:1APX), whereas the model of grape polyphenol oxidase was obtained directly from the available X-ray structure (PDB ID:2P3X). Molecular docking of common substrates of these two enzymes was subsequently studied. It was found that epicatechin and catechin exhibited high affinity with both enzymes, even though POD and PPO have different binding pockets regarding the size and the key amino acids involved in binding. Predicted binding modes of substrates with both enzymes were also compared. The calculated docking interaction energy of trihydroxybenzoic acid related compounds shows high affinity, suggesting specificity and potential use as common inhibitor to grape ascorbate peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. © 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
format Journal
author Prontipa Nokthai
Vannajan Sanghiran Lee
Lalida Shank
author_facet Prontipa Nokthai
Vannajan Sanghiran Lee
Lalida Shank
author_sort Prontipa Nokthai
title Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison
title_short Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison
title_full Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison
title_fullStr Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison
title_full_unstemmed Molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate specificity and active site comparison
title_sort molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase: substrate specificity and active site comparison
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958530134&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50543
_version_ 1681423608798248960