Comparative study between chitin/polyacrylic acid (paa) dressing, lipido-colloid absorbent dressing and alginate wound dressing: A pilot study in the treatment of partial-thickness wound

• Main Authors: Apichai Angspatt, Puttan Tanvatcharaphan, Somruethai Channasanon, Siriporn Tanodekaew, Prayuth Chokrungvaranont, Wimol Sirimaharaj
• Format: Journal
• Published: 2018
• Subjects: Medicine
• Online Access: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954518309&origin=inward; http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51063
• Institution: Chiang Mai University

Background: Polyacrylic acid grafted chitin (Chitin-PAA) contains a hydrogel characteristic that makes it more suitable for wound dressing application. In animal models, Chitin-PAA dressing exhibited properties as a promising dressing. Epithelization promotion, rapid reduction of wound size, reduction of inflammatory cell response, and less toxicity had been noted. Objective: Carryout a pilot clinical comparative study of Chitin-PAA dressing, lipido-colloid absorbent dressing, and alginate wound dressing in the treatment of partial-thickness wound. Material and Method: Between June 2006 and March 2007, 36 partial-thickness wounds were randomized into three groups and three different types of dressing were used. Each wound was treated until it was completely healed, and a visual analogue scale was used for the pain evaluation. Result: The present study shows the visual analogue pain score in the Chitin-PAA group seems to be a bit higher than the Urgocell®group but not statistically different. The completely healed day is not significantly different. Three patients in the lipido-colloid absorbent dressing groups had wound infection but eventually healed after treatment. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in terms of visual analogue pain score and healing time between the lipido- colloid absorbent dressing, alginate dressing, and chitin-PAA dressing.