Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior

Surface bloom of Microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii occurs frequently in reservoirs and aquaculture ponds in Thailand. Previous studies showed the effectiveness of ultrasonic irradiation at sinking M. aeruginosa cells. This study 1) compared the efficiency of ultrasonic treatment at sinking M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pawalee Srisuksomwong, Yuwadee Peerapornpisal, Nakao Nomura, Niwooti Whangchai
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872974520&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51333
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-51333
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-513332018-09-04T06:13:49Z Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior Pawalee Srisuksomwong Yuwadee Peerapornpisal Nakao Nomura Niwooti Whangchai Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Chemistry Materials Science Mathematics Physics and Astronomy Surface bloom of Microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii occurs frequently in reservoirs and aquaculture ponds in Thailand. Previous studies showed the effectiveness of ultrasonic irradiation at sinking M. aeruginosa cells. This study 1) compared the efficiency of ultrasonic treatment at sinking M. aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii, 2) investigated the ultrastructure of Microcystis cells using TEM before and after ultrasonic treatment and 3) determined the re-flotation behavior of sonicated M. aeruginosa. Initial chlorophyll-a concentrations of M. wesenbergii and M. aeruginosa were 4.674 ± 0.107 mg/L and 4.447 ± 0.024 mg/L, respectively. M. wesenbergii exhibited less efficient algal sedimentation than that of M. aeruginosa after sonication for 120-600 seconds (p<0.05). This result implied that the species of Microcystis which comprise the surface bloom affect ultrasonic treatment efficiency. Transmission electron micrographs confirmed the mechanical damage brought to the cell vacuoles and structures by ultrasonic cavitation. Moreover, after sonication for 30 seconds, M. aeruginosa cells (initial chlorophyll a of 4.560 ± 0.040 mg/L) could not re-float to the surface over 10 observation days. 2018-09-04T06:00:26Z 2018-09-04T06:00:26Z 2012-12-01 Journal 01252526 2-s2.0-84872974520 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872974520&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51333
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemistry
Materials Science
Mathematics
Physics and Astronomy
spellingShingle Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemistry
Materials Science
Mathematics
Physics and Astronomy
Pawalee Srisuksomwong
Yuwadee Peerapornpisal
Nakao Nomura
Niwooti Whangchai
Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior
description Surface bloom of Microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii occurs frequently in reservoirs and aquaculture ponds in Thailand. Previous studies showed the effectiveness of ultrasonic irradiation at sinking M. aeruginosa cells. This study 1) compared the efficiency of ultrasonic treatment at sinking M. aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii, 2) investigated the ultrastructure of Microcystis cells using TEM before and after ultrasonic treatment and 3) determined the re-flotation behavior of sonicated M. aeruginosa. Initial chlorophyll-a concentrations of M. wesenbergii and M. aeruginosa were 4.674 ± 0.107 mg/L and 4.447 ± 0.024 mg/L, respectively. M. wesenbergii exhibited less efficient algal sedimentation than that of M. aeruginosa after sonication for 120-600 seconds (p<0.05). This result implied that the species of Microcystis which comprise the surface bloom affect ultrasonic treatment efficiency. Transmission electron micrographs confirmed the mechanical damage brought to the cell vacuoles and structures by ultrasonic cavitation. Moreover, after sonication for 30 seconds, M. aeruginosa cells (initial chlorophyll a of 4.560 ± 0.040 mg/L) could not re-float to the surface over 10 observation days.
format Journal
author Pawalee Srisuksomwong
Yuwadee Peerapornpisal
Nakao Nomura
Niwooti Whangchai
author_facet Pawalee Srisuksomwong
Yuwadee Peerapornpisal
Nakao Nomura
Niwooti Whangchai
author_sort Pawalee Srisuksomwong
title Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior
title_short Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior
title_full Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior
title_fullStr Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior
title_full_unstemmed Comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior
title_sort comparative ultrasonic irradiation efficiency of microcystis aeruginosa and m. wesenbergii from surface bloom and re-flotation behavior
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872974520&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51333
_version_ 1681423750837305344