Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. Methods: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Kambungton, A. Janhom, S. Prapayasatok, S. Pongsiriwet
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856685330&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51557
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-51557
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-515572018-09-04T06:12:04Z Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film J. Kambungton A. Janhom S. Prapayasatok S. Pongsiriwet Dentistry Medicine Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. Methods: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ±20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (Az) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of Az values: CBCT 5 0.811, film 5 0.797 and sensor 5 0.775; p=0.771). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth. © 2012 The British Institute of Radiology. 2018-09-04T06:04:11Z 2018-09-04T06:04:11Z 2012-02-01 Journal 0250832X 2-s2.0-84856685330 10.1259/dmfr/49798768 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856685330&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51557
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Dentistry
Medicine
spellingShingle Dentistry
Medicine
J. Kambungton
A. Janhom
S. Prapayasatok
S. Pongsiriwet
Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. Methods: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ±20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (Az) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of Az values: CBCT 5 0.811, film 5 0.797 and sensor 5 0.775; p=0.771). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth. © 2012 The British Institute of Radiology.
format Journal
author J. Kambungton
A. Janhom
S. Prapayasatok
S. Pongsiriwet
author_facet J. Kambungton
A. Janhom
S. Prapayasatok
S. Pongsiriwet
author_sort J. Kambungton
title Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_short Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_full Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_fullStr Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: Cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_sort assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam ct, intraoral digital radiography and film
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856685330&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51557
_version_ 1681423791291367424