Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand

Background: In late 2009, the Thai Ministry of Public Health provided two million doses of the monovalent pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 vaccine (Panenza® Sanofi Pasteur), which was the only vaccine formulation available in Thailand, to persons at risk of more severe manifestations of the disease incl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nuntisa Chotirosniramit, Patcharaphan Sugandhavesa, Linda Aurpibul, Sunida Thetket, Natthapol Kosashunhanan, Taweewat Supindham, Panuwat Wongkulab, Quanhathai Kaewpoowat, Kanokporn Chaiklang, Oranitcha Kaewthip, Piyathida Sroysuwan, Antika Wongthanee, Hatairat Lerdsamran, Pilaipan Puthavathana, Khuanchai Suparatpinyo
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872231259&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51710
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-51710
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-517102018-09-04T06:13:03Z Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand Nuntisa Chotirosniramit Patcharaphan Sugandhavesa Linda Aurpibul Sunida Thetket Natthapol Kosashunhanan Taweewat Supindham Panuwat Wongkulab Quanhathai Kaewpoowat Kanokporn Chaiklang Oranitcha Kaewthip Piyathida Sroysuwan Antika Wongthanee Hatairat Lerdsamran Pilaipan Puthavathana Khuanchai Suparatpinyo Immunology and Microbiology Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Background: In late 2009, the Thai Ministry of Public Health provided two million doses of the monovalent pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 vaccine (Panenza® Sanofi Pasteur), which was the only vaccine formulation available in Thailand, to persons at risk of more severe manifestations of the disease including HIV infection. Several studies have shown poorer immune responses to the 2009 H1N1 vaccines in HIV-infected individuals. There are limited data in this population in resource-limited countries. Results: At day 28 post-vaccination, seroconversion was found in 32.0% (95% CI 24.5-40.2) of the HIV-infected group and 35.0% (95% CI 15.4-59.2) of the healthy controls (p = 0.79). Seroprotection rate was observed in 33.3% (95% CI 25.8-41.6) and 35.0% (95% CI 15.4-59.2) of the HIV-infected group and the control group, respectively (p = 0.88). Among HIV-infected participants, the strongest factor associated with vaccine response was age 42 y or younger (p = 0.05). Methods: We evaluated the immunogenicity of a single, 15μg/0.5ml dose of a monovalent, non-adjuvanted 2009 H1N1 vaccine in 150 HIV-infected Thai adults and 20 healthy controls. Immunogenicity was measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay (HI) at baseline and 28 d after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as 1) pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and post-vaccination HI titer ≥ 1:40, or 2) pre-vaccination HI titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum of 4-fold rise in post-vaccination HI titer. Seroprotection was defined as a post-vaccination HI titer of ≥ 1:40. Conclusions: A low seroconversion rate to the 2009 H1N1 vaccine in both study groups, corresponding with data from trials in the region, may suggest that the vaccine used in our study is not very immunogenic. Further studies on different vaccines, dosing, adjuvants, or schedule strategies may be needed to achieve effective immunization in HIV-infected population. © 2012 Landes Bioscience. 2018-09-04T06:06:49Z 2018-09-04T06:06:49Z 2012-12-01 Journal 2164554X 21645515 2-s2.0-84872231259 10.4161/hv.21820 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872231259&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51710
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Immunology and Microbiology
Medicine
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
spellingShingle Immunology and Microbiology
Medicine
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Nuntisa Chotirosniramit
Patcharaphan Sugandhavesa
Linda Aurpibul
Sunida Thetket
Natthapol Kosashunhanan
Taweewat Supindham
Panuwat Wongkulab
Quanhathai Kaewpoowat
Kanokporn Chaiklang
Oranitcha Kaewthip
Piyathida Sroysuwan
Antika Wongthanee
Hatairat Lerdsamran
Pilaipan Puthavathana
Khuanchai Suparatpinyo
Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand
description Background: In late 2009, the Thai Ministry of Public Health provided two million doses of the monovalent pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 vaccine (Panenza® Sanofi Pasteur), which was the only vaccine formulation available in Thailand, to persons at risk of more severe manifestations of the disease including HIV infection. Several studies have shown poorer immune responses to the 2009 H1N1 vaccines in HIV-infected individuals. There are limited data in this population in resource-limited countries. Results: At day 28 post-vaccination, seroconversion was found in 32.0% (95% CI 24.5-40.2) of the HIV-infected group and 35.0% (95% CI 15.4-59.2) of the healthy controls (p = 0.79). Seroprotection rate was observed in 33.3% (95% CI 25.8-41.6) and 35.0% (95% CI 15.4-59.2) of the HIV-infected group and the control group, respectively (p = 0.88). Among HIV-infected participants, the strongest factor associated with vaccine response was age 42 y or younger (p = 0.05). Methods: We evaluated the immunogenicity of a single, 15μg/0.5ml dose of a monovalent, non-adjuvanted 2009 H1N1 vaccine in 150 HIV-infected Thai adults and 20 healthy controls. Immunogenicity was measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay (HI) at baseline and 28 d after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as 1) pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and post-vaccination HI titer ≥ 1:40, or 2) pre-vaccination HI titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum of 4-fold rise in post-vaccination HI titer. Seroprotection was defined as a post-vaccination HI titer of ≥ 1:40. Conclusions: A low seroconversion rate to the 2009 H1N1 vaccine in both study groups, corresponding with data from trials in the region, may suggest that the vaccine used in our study is not very immunogenic. Further studies on different vaccines, dosing, adjuvants, or schedule strategies may be needed to achieve effective immunization in HIV-infected population. © 2012 Landes Bioscience.
format Journal
author Nuntisa Chotirosniramit
Patcharaphan Sugandhavesa
Linda Aurpibul
Sunida Thetket
Natthapol Kosashunhanan
Taweewat Supindham
Panuwat Wongkulab
Quanhathai Kaewpoowat
Kanokporn Chaiklang
Oranitcha Kaewthip
Piyathida Sroysuwan
Antika Wongthanee
Hatairat Lerdsamran
Pilaipan Puthavathana
Khuanchai Suparatpinyo
author_facet Nuntisa Chotirosniramit
Patcharaphan Sugandhavesa
Linda Aurpibul
Sunida Thetket
Natthapol Kosashunhanan
Taweewat Supindham
Panuwat Wongkulab
Quanhathai Kaewpoowat
Kanokporn Chaiklang
Oranitcha Kaewthip
Piyathida Sroysuwan
Antika Wongthanee
Hatairat Lerdsamran
Pilaipan Puthavathana
Khuanchai Suparatpinyo
author_sort Nuntisa Chotirosniramit
title Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand
title_short Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand
title_full Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand
title_fullStr Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Immune response to 2009 H1N1 vaccine in HIV-infected adults in Northern Thailand
title_sort immune response to 2009 h1n1 vaccine in hiv-infected adults in northern thailand
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872231259&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51710
_version_ 1681423818828021760