The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses to DLT intubation compared to placebo and to assess the adverse effects related to dexmedetomidine. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive 0.7 g/kg dexmedetomidine (n=30) or normal saline (n=...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, Yodying Punjasawadwong, Somrat Charuluxananan, Worawut Lapisatepun, Pavena Bunburaphong
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84883198846&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52813
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-52813
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-528132018-09-04T09:32:46Z The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial Tanyong Pipanmekaporn Yodying Punjasawadwong Somrat Charuluxananan Worawut Lapisatepun Pavena Bunburaphong Medicine The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses to DLT intubation compared to placebo and to assess the adverse effects related to dexmedetomidine. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive 0.7 g/kg dexmedetomidine (n=30) or normal saline (n=30) 10 minutes before general anesthesia. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and rate pressure product (RPP) between groups were recorded. During intubation and 10 minutes afterward (T1-T10), the mean SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and RPP in the control group were significantly higher than those in the dexmedetomidine group throughout the study period except at T1. The mean differences of SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and RPP were significantly higher in the control group, with the value of 15.2 mmHg, 10.5 mmHg, 14 mmHg, 10.5 beats per minute, and 2,462.8 mmHg min-1. Four patients in the dexmedetomidine group and 1 patient in the control group developed hypotension, while 2 patients in the dexmedetomidine group had bradycardia. Prophylactic dexmedetomidine can attenuate the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and DLT intubation with minimal adverse effects. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01289769. © 2013 Tanyong Pipanmekaporn et al. 2018-09-04T09:32:46Z 2018-09-04T09:32:46Z 2013-09-03 Journal 16876970 16876962 2-s2.0-84883198846 10.1155/2013/236089 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84883198846&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52813
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Tanyong Pipanmekaporn
Yodying Punjasawadwong
Somrat Charuluxananan
Worawut Lapisatepun
Pavena Bunburaphong
The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
description The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses to DLT intubation compared to placebo and to assess the adverse effects related to dexmedetomidine. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive 0.7 g/kg dexmedetomidine (n=30) or normal saline (n=30) 10 minutes before general anesthesia. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and rate pressure product (RPP) between groups were recorded. During intubation and 10 minutes afterward (T1-T10), the mean SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and RPP in the control group were significantly higher than those in the dexmedetomidine group throughout the study period except at T1. The mean differences of SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and RPP were significantly higher in the control group, with the value of 15.2 mmHg, 10.5 mmHg, 14 mmHg, 10.5 beats per minute, and 2,462.8 mmHg min-1. Four patients in the dexmedetomidine group and 1 patient in the control group developed hypotension, while 2 patients in the dexmedetomidine group had bradycardia. Prophylactic dexmedetomidine can attenuate the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and DLT intubation with minimal adverse effects. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01289769. © 2013 Tanyong Pipanmekaporn et al.
format Journal
author Tanyong Pipanmekaporn
Yodying Punjasawadwong
Somrat Charuluxananan
Worawut Lapisatepun
Pavena Bunburaphong
author_facet Tanyong Pipanmekaporn
Yodying Punjasawadwong
Somrat Charuluxananan
Worawut Lapisatepun
Pavena Bunburaphong
author_sort Tanyong Pipanmekaporn
title The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
title_short The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
title_full The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
title_sort effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84883198846&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52813
_version_ 1681424019710017536