Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction

Objectives: To analyse cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response parameters in normal volunteers and vertiginous patients. Subjects and methods: A prospective study of 50 normal subjects and 50 patients with vertigo was conducted at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand. Cervical ves...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Isaradisaikul, N. Navacharoen, C. Hanprasertpong, J. Kangsanarak
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884489709&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52816
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-52816
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-528162018-09-04T09:32:48Z Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction S. Isaradisaikul N. Navacharoen C. Hanprasertpong J. Kangsanarak Medicine Objectives: To analyse cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response parameters in normal volunteers and vertiginous patients. Subjects and methods: A prospective study of 50 normal subjects and 50 patients with vertigo was conducted at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses were measured using air-conducted, 500-Hz, tone-burst stimuli with subjects in a sitting position with their head turned toward the contralateral shoulder. Results: The mean ± standard deviation age and male:female ratio in the normal (44.0 ± 9.3 years; 12:38) and vertigo groups (44.7 ± 9.8 years; 17:33) were not significantly different. The prevalence of absent responses in the normal (14 per cent) and vertigo ears (46 per cent) differed significantly (p < 0.0001). Other cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential parameters (i.e. response threshold, P1 and N1 latency, P1-N1 interlatency and interamplitude, inter-ear difference in P1 threshold, and asymmetry ratio) showed no inter-group differences. Conclusion: The absence of a cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response is useful in the identification of vestibular dysfunction. However, patients should undergo a comprehensive battery of other vestibular tests to supplement their cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response findings. © JLO (1984) Limited 2013. 2018-09-04T09:32:48Z 2018-09-04T09:32:48Z 2013-09-01 Journal 17485460 00222151 2-s2.0-84884489709 10.1017/S0022215113001655 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884489709&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52816
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
S. Isaradisaikul
N. Navacharoen
C. Hanprasertpong
J. Kangsanarak
Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction
description Objectives: To analyse cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response parameters in normal volunteers and vertiginous patients. Subjects and methods: A prospective study of 50 normal subjects and 50 patients with vertigo was conducted at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses were measured using air-conducted, 500-Hz, tone-burst stimuli with subjects in a sitting position with their head turned toward the contralateral shoulder. Results: The mean ± standard deviation age and male:female ratio in the normal (44.0 ± 9.3 years; 12:38) and vertigo groups (44.7 ± 9.8 years; 17:33) were not significantly different. The prevalence of absent responses in the normal (14 per cent) and vertigo ears (46 per cent) differed significantly (p < 0.0001). Other cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential parameters (i.e. response threshold, P1 and N1 latency, P1-N1 interlatency and interamplitude, inter-ear difference in P1 threshold, and asymmetry ratio) showed no inter-group differences. Conclusion: The absence of a cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response is useful in the identification of vestibular dysfunction. However, patients should undergo a comprehensive battery of other vestibular tests to supplement their cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response findings. © JLO (1984) Limited 2013.
format Journal
author S. Isaradisaikul
N. Navacharoen
C. Hanprasertpong
J. Kangsanarak
author_facet S. Isaradisaikul
N. Navacharoen
C. Hanprasertpong
J. Kangsanarak
author_sort S. Isaradisaikul
title Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction
title_short Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction
title_full Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction
title_fullStr Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction
title_sort role of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in identifying vestibular dysfunction
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884489709&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52816
_version_ 1681424020260519936