Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis

Objective: To evaluate the cost utility of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing plus first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with activating EGFR mutations in Thailand. Methods: The study used a decision tree model considering the provider's perspective. Direct medical costs were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Unchalee Permsuwan, Narawadee Niamhun, Narumon Tanatip, Sumitra Thongprasert
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897471037&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53467
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-53467
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-534672018-09-04T10:00:28Z Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis Unchalee Permsuwan Narawadee Niamhun Narumon Tanatip Sumitra Thongprasert Economics, Econometrics and Finance Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Objective: To evaluate the cost utility of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing plus first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with activating EGFR mutations in Thailand. Methods: The study used a decision tree model considering the provider's perspective. Direct medical costs were included and based on a local Thai database. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life-year and based on randomized controlled trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and presented in 2012. A series of one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: We found that the EGFR testing plus first-line gefitinib alternative gained 0.03 quality-adjusted life-year more, but 62,540 Thailand baht (US $2082.58) less total costs compared with the no-testing alternative. The results were robust when varying most variables in the model except for the duration of gefitinib treatment with activating EGFR mutation, the duration of chemotherapy treatment with activating EGFR mutation, and the utility of second-line chemotherapy. Conclusions: EGFR testing should be considered before administering EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib as first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Thailand where the incidence of EGFR mutation is high. © 2014. 2018-09-04T09:49:42Z 2018-09-04T09:49:42Z 2014-01-01 Journal 22121099 2-s2.0-84897471037 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.12.001 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897471037&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53467
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Medicine
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
spellingShingle Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Medicine
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Unchalee Permsuwan
Narawadee Niamhun
Narumon Tanatip
Sumitra Thongprasert
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis
description Objective: To evaluate the cost utility of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing plus first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with activating EGFR mutations in Thailand. Methods: The study used a decision tree model considering the provider's perspective. Direct medical costs were included and based on a local Thai database. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life-year and based on randomized controlled trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and presented in 2012. A series of one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: We found that the EGFR testing plus first-line gefitinib alternative gained 0.03 quality-adjusted life-year more, but 62,540 Thailand baht (US $2082.58) less total costs compared with the no-testing alternative. The results were robust when varying most variables in the model except for the duration of gefitinib treatment with activating EGFR mutation, the duration of chemotherapy treatment with activating EGFR mutation, and the utility of second-line chemotherapy. Conclusions: EGFR testing should be considered before administering EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib as first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Thailand where the incidence of EGFR mutation is high. © 2014.
format Journal
author Unchalee Permsuwan
Narawadee Niamhun
Narumon Tanatip
Sumitra Thongprasert
author_facet Unchalee Permsuwan
Narawadee Niamhun
Narumon Tanatip
Sumitra Thongprasert
author_sort Unchalee Permsuwan
title Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis
title_short Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis
title_full Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis
title_fullStr Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis
title_sort epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in thailand: a cost-utility analysis
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897471037&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53467
_version_ 1681424140680036352