Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis
Objective: To evaluate the cost utility of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing plus first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with activating EGFR mutations in Thailand. Methods: The study used a decision tree model considering the provider's perspective. Direct medical costs were...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897471037&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53467 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-53467 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-534672018-09-04T10:00:28Z Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis Unchalee Permsuwan Narawadee Niamhun Narumon Tanatip Sumitra Thongprasert Economics, Econometrics and Finance Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Objective: To evaluate the cost utility of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing plus first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with activating EGFR mutations in Thailand. Methods: The study used a decision tree model considering the provider's perspective. Direct medical costs were included and based on a local Thai database. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life-year and based on randomized controlled trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and presented in 2012. A series of one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: We found that the EGFR testing plus first-line gefitinib alternative gained 0.03 quality-adjusted life-year more, but 62,540 Thailand baht (US $2082.58) less total costs compared with the no-testing alternative. The results were robust when varying most variables in the model except for the duration of gefitinib treatment with activating EGFR mutation, the duration of chemotherapy treatment with activating EGFR mutation, and the utility of second-line chemotherapy. Conclusions: EGFR testing should be considered before administering EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib as first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Thailand where the incidence of EGFR mutation is high. © 2014. 2018-09-04T09:49:42Z 2018-09-04T09:49:42Z 2014-01-01 Journal 22121099 2-s2.0-84897471037 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.12.001 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897471037&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53467 |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
topic |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics |
spellingShingle |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Unchalee Permsuwan Narawadee Niamhun Narumon Tanatip Sumitra Thongprasert Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the cost utility of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing plus first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with activating EGFR mutations in Thailand. Methods: The study used a decision tree model considering the provider's perspective. Direct medical costs were included and based on a local Thai database. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life-year and based on randomized controlled trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and presented in 2012. A series of one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: We found that the EGFR testing plus first-line gefitinib alternative gained 0.03 quality-adjusted life-year more, but 62,540 Thailand baht (US $2082.58) less total costs compared with the no-testing alternative. The results were robust when varying most variables in the model except for the duration of gefitinib treatment with activating EGFR mutation, the duration of chemotherapy treatment with activating EGFR mutation, and the utility of second-line chemotherapy. Conclusions: EGFR testing should be considered before administering EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib as first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Thailand where the incidence of EGFR mutation is high. © 2014. |
format |
Journal |
author |
Unchalee Permsuwan Narawadee Niamhun Narumon Tanatip Sumitra Thongprasert |
author_facet |
Unchalee Permsuwan Narawadee Niamhun Narumon Tanatip Sumitra Thongprasert |
author_sort |
Unchalee Permsuwan |
title |
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis |
title_short |
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis |
title_full |
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis |
title_fullStr |
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in Thailand: A cost-utility analysis |
title_sort |
epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in thailand: a cost-utility analysis |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897471037&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53467 |
_version_ |
1681424140680036352 |