Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating

Thermal spray coatings have become one of the most potential for hard chrome replacement, particularly for wear and corrosion applications. In this study four types of hard coating materials were selected and thermally sprayed by suitable processes as the following designated codes (material/spray t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Meekhanthong, S. Wirojanupatump
Format: Book Series
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904133434&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53524
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-53524
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-535242018-09-04T09:50:49Z Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating K. Meekhanthong S. Wirojanupatump Engineering Thermal spray coatings have become one of the most potential for hard chrome replacement, particularly for wear and corrosion applications. In this study four types of hard coating materials were selected and thermally sprayed by suitable processes as the following designated codes (material/spray technique): Cr-Fe/HVOF, Cr-Ni/HVOF, WC-Ni/SF and Cr- Fe/AS. All of starting materials were characterized in order to create a correlation between spray materials and coating characteristics. SEM was employed for morphology and microstructure investigation. Particle size analysis was investigated by SEM and laser particle size analyzer. Coating characterization included surface roughness measurment by profilometer, porosity evaluation by image analysis and hardness test by Vicker microhardness tester. Microstructure of coatings was also revealed by SEM. Wear performance was evaluated by pin on disc test and dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test. Corrosion resistance was tested by potentiodynamic method. The results showed that particle size and morphology of starting powders were various depending on manufacturing method. Chemical compositions of starting materials showed great effect on coating properties and performance. Coatings deposited by HVOF and spray & fuse (SF) method showed typically dense and homogeneous structure than arc sprayed coating. WC-Ni/SF coating showed lowest abrasive wear rate compared to other thermally sprayed coatings. All Ni base coatings had significantly lower corrosion rates while Cr-Ni/HVOF coating had lowest corrosion rate. Although Cr-Ni/HVOF and WC-Ni/SF could be applicable for both wear and corrosion applications, for heat sensitive parts, Cr-Ni/HVOF coating could be a better alternative to spray and fuse. © (2014) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland. 2018-09-04T09:50:49Z 2018-09-04T09:50:49Z 2014-01-01 Book Series 16628985 10226680 2-s2.0-84904133434 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.974.183 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904133434&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53524
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Engineering
spellingShingle Engineering
K. Meekhanthong
S. Wirojanupatump
Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating
description Thermal spray coatings have become one of the most potential for hard chrome replacement, particularly for wear and corrosion applications. In this study four types of hard coating materials were selected and thermally sprayed by suitable processes as the following designated codes (material/spray technique): Cr-Fe/HVOF, Cr-Ni/HVOF, WC-Ni/SF and Cr- Fe/AS. All of starting materials were characterized in order to create a correlation between spray materials and coating characteristics. SEM was employed for morphology and microstructure investigation. Particle size analysis was investigated by SEM and laser particle size analyzer. Coating characterization included surface roughness measurment by profilometer, porosity evaluation by image analysis and hardness test by Vicker microhardness tester. Microstructure of coatings was also revealed by SEM. Wear performance was evaluated by pin on disc test and dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test. Corrosion resistance was tested by potentiodynamic method. The results showed that particle size and morphology of starting powders were various depending on manufacturing method. Chemical compositions of starting materials showed great effect on coating properties and performance. Coatings deposited by HVOF and spray & fuse (SF) method showed typically dense and homogeneous structure than arc sprayed coating. WC-Ni/SF coating showed lowest abrasive wear rate compared to other thermally sprayed coatings. All Ni base coatings had significantly lower corrosion rates while Cr-Ni/HVOF coating had lowest corrosion rate. Although Cr-Ni/HVOF and WC-Ni/SF could be applicable for both wear and corrosion applications, for heat sensitive parts, Cr-Ni/HVOF coating could be a better alternative to spray and fuse. © (2014) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.
format Book Series
author K. Meekhanthong
S. Wirojanupatump
author_facet K. Meekhanthong
S. Wirojanupatump
author_sort K. Meekhanthong
title Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating
title_short Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating
title_full Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating
title_fullStr Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating
title_full_unstemmed Characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating
title_sort characterization and comparison of thermally sprayed hard coatings as alternative to hard chrome plating
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904133434&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53524
_version_ 1681424151319937024