Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Precise estimated risks and benefits of quetiapine for acute bipolar depression are needed for clinical practice. Objective: To systematically review the efficacy and the tolerability of quetiapine, either as monotherapy or combination therapy, for acute bipolar depression. Methods: We i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sirijit Suttajit, Manit Srisurapanont, Narong Maneeton, Benchalak Maneeton
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903385949&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53882
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-53882
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-538822018-09-04T10:00:18Z Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sirijit Suttajit Manit Srisurapanont Narong Maneeton Benchalak Maneeton Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Background: Precise estimated risks and benefits of quetiapine for acute bipolar depression are needed for clinical practice. Objective: To systematically review the efficacy and the tolerability of quetiapine, either as monotherapy or combination therapy, for acute bipolar depression. Methods: We included all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing quetiapine with other treatments, including placebo, in patients with acute bipolar depression (bipolar I or II disorder, major depressive episode). Published and unpublished RCTs were identified using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE®, Web of Knowledge™, CINAHL®, PsycINFO®, the EU Clinical Trials Register database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The primary outcome was the change scores of depression rating scales. Results: Eleven RCTs (n=3,488) were included. Two of them were conducted in children and adolescents. The change in depression scores was significantly greater in the quetiapine group compared with the placebo group (mean difference, [MD] =-4.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.59 to -3.73). The significant difference was observed from week 1. Compared with placebo, quetiapine had higher incidence rates of extrapyramidal side effects, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, dry mouth, increased appetite, and weight gain but lower risks of treatment-emergent mania and headache. Quetiapine treatment was associated with significant improvement of clinical global impression, quality of life, sleep quality, anxiety, and functioning. Conclusion: Quetiapine monotherapy is effective for acute bipolar depression and the prevention of mania/hypomania switching. Its common adverse effects are extrapyramidal side effects, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, dry mouth, increased appetite, and weight gain. The lower risk of headache in quetiapine-treated patients with acute bipolar depression should be further investigated. The evidence for the use of quetiapine combined with mood stabilizers in children and adolescents with acute bipolar depression is too small to support the clinical practice. © 2014 Suttajit et al. 2018-09-04T10:00:18Z 2018-09-04T10:00:18Z 2014-06-25 Journal 11778881 2-s2.0-84903385949 10.2147/DDDT.S63779 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903385949&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53882
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
spellingShingle Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Sirijit Suttajit
Manit Srisurapanont
Narong Maneeton
Benchalak Maneeton
Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
description Background: Precise estimated risks and benefits of quetiapine for acute bipolar depression are needed for clinical practice. Objective: To systematically review the efficacy and the tolerability of quetiapine, either as monotherapy or combination therapy, for acute bipolar depression. Methods: We included all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing quetiapine with other treatments, including placebo, in patients with acute bipolar depression (bipolar I or II disorder, major depressive episode). Published and unpublished RCTs were identified using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE®, Web of Knowledge™, CINAHL®, PsycINFO®, the EU Clinical Trials Register database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The primary outcome was the change scores of depression rating scales. Results: Eleven RCTs (n=3,488) were included. Two of them were conducted in children and adolescents. The change in depression scores was significantly greater in the quetiapine group compared with the placebo group (mean difference, [MD] =-4.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.59 to -3.73). The significant difference was observed from week 1. Compared with placebo, quetiapine had higher incidence rates of extrapyramidal side effects, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, dry mouth, increased appetite, and weight gain but lower risks of treatment-emergent mania and headache. Quetiapine treatment was associated with significant improvement of clinical global impression, quality of life, sleep quality, anxiety, and functioning. Conclusion: Quetiapine monotherapy is effective for acute bipolar depression and the prevention of mania/hypomania switching. Its common adverse effects are extrapyramidal side effects, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, dry mouth, increased appetite, and weight gain. The lower risk of headache in quetiapine-treated patients with acute bipolar depression should be further investigated. The evidence for the use of quetiapine combined with mood stabilizers in children and adolescents with acute bipolar depression is too small to support the clinical practice. © 2014 Suttajit et al.
format Journal
author Sirijit Suttajit
Manit Srisurapanont
Narong Maneeton
Benchalak Maneeton
author_facet Sirijit Suttajit
Manit Srisurapanont
Narong Maneeton
Benchalak Maneeton
author_sort Sirijit Suttajit
title Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort quetiapine for acute bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903385949&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53882
_version_ 1681424217685360640