Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies

© 2015, INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France. The prevalence of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested A. mellifera colonies in Thailand was monitored. We also assessed the fecundity of T. mercedesae and V. destructor in naturally infested brood and in brood cells del...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ninat Buawangpong, Lilia I. de Guzman, Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong, Amanda M. Frake, Michael Burgett, Panuwan Chantawannakul
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84946593472&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53970
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-53970
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-539702018-09-04T10:06:07Z Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies Ninat Buawangpong Lilia I. de Guzman Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong Amanda M. Frake Michael Burgett Panuwan Chantawannakul Agricultural and Biological Sciences © 2015, INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France. The prevalence of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested A. mellifera colonies in Thailand was monitored. We also assessed the fecundity of T. mercedesae and V. destructor in naturally infested brood and in brood cells deliberately infested with both mite genera. Results showed that the natural co-infestation of an individual brood cell by both mite genera was rare (<0.1 %). Overall, T. mercedesae was the more dominant brood parasite of A. mellifera than V. destructor. In naturally infested brood, the proportion of nonreproductive Tropilaelaps (29.8 ± 3.9 %) was lower than that of Varroa (49.6 ± 5.9 %). Both mites produced similar numbers of progeny (T. mercedesae = 1.48 ± 0.05; V. destructor = 1.69 ± 0.14). The two mite genera also reproduced normally when they were deliberately introduced into the same brood cells. In two separate assessments, the average worker brood infestations of T. mercedesae (19.9 %) were significantly higher than that of V. destructor (0.7 %). Our results on the higher prevalence and reproductive ability of T. mercedesae in concurrently infested colonies reaffirm Tropilaelaps’ competitive advantage over V. destructor and their reported negative impact to A. mellifera colonies. 2018-09-04T10:06:07Z 2018-09-04T10:06:07Z 2015-11-01 Journal 12979678 00448435 2-s2.0-84946593472 10.1007/s13592-015-0368-8 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84946593472&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53970
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Agricultural and Biological Sciences
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ninat Buawangpong
Lilia I. de Guzman
Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong
Amanda M. Frake
Michael Burgett
Panuwan Chantawannakul
Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies
description © 2015, INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France. The prevalence of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested A. mellifera colonies in Thailand was monitored. We also assessed the fecundity of T. mercedesae and V. destructor in naturally infested brood and in brood cells deliberately infested with both mite genera. Results showed that the natural co-infestation of an individual brood cell by both mite genera was rare (<0.1 %). Overall, T. mercedesae was the more dominant brood parasite of A. mellifera than V. destructor. In naturally infested brood, the proportion of nonreproductive Tropilaelaps (29.8 ± 3.9 %) was lower than that of Varroa (49.6 ± 5.9 %). Both mites produced similar numbers of progeny (T. mercedesae = 1.48 ± 0.05; V. destructor = 1.69 ± 0.14). The two mite genera also reproduced normally when they were deliberately introduced into the same brood cells. In two separate assessments, the average worker brood infestations of T. mercedesae (19.9 %) were significantly higher than that of V. destructor (0.7 %). Our results on the higher prevalence and reproductive ability of T. mercedesae in concurrently infested colonies reaffirm Tropilaelaps’ competitive advantage over V. destructor and their reported negative impact to A. mellifera colonies.
format Journal
author Ninat Buawangpong
Lilia I. de Guzman
Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong
Amanda M. Frake
Michael Burgett
Panuwan Chantawannakul
author_facet Ninat Buawangpong
Lilia I. de Guzman
Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong
Amanda M. Frake
Michael Burgett
Panuwan Chantawannakul
author_sort Ninat Buawangpong
title Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies
title_short Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies
title_full Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies
title_fullStr Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and reproduction of Tropilaelaps mercedesae and Varroa destructor in concurrently infested Apis mellifera colonies
title_sort prevalence and reproduction of tropilaelaps mercedesae and varroa destructor in concurrently infested apis mellifera colonies
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84946593472&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53970
_version_ 1681424234052583424