Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image classification is one of the challenging problems because of the difficult characteristics of SAR images. In this chapter, we implement SAR image classification on three military vehicles types, i.e., T72 tank...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book Series |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84951335693&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54353 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-54353 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-543532018-09-04T10:12:18Z Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features Sansanee Auephanwiriyakul Yutthana Munklang Nipon Theera-Umpon Computer Science © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image classification is one of the challenging problems because of the difficult characteristics of SAR images. In this chapter, we implement SAR image classification on three military vehicles types, i.e., T72 tank, BMP2 armored personnel carriers (APCs), and BTR70 APCs. The texture features generated from the fuzzy co-occurrence matrix (FCOM) are utilized with the multi-class support vector machine (MSVM) and the radial basis function (RBF) network. Finally, the ensemble average is implemented as a fusion tool as well. The best detection result is at 97.94% correct detection from the fusion of twenty best FCOM with RBF network models (ten best RBF network models at d = 5 and other ten best RBF network models at d = 10). Whereas the best fusion result of FCOM with MSVM is at 95.37% correct classification. This comes from the fusion of ten best MSVM models at d = 5 and other ten best MSVM models at d = 10. As a comparison we also generate features from the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). This feature set is implemented on the same classifiers. The results from FCOM are better than those from GLCM in all cases. 2018-09-04T10:12:18Z 2018-09-04T10:12:18Z 2015-01-01 Book Series 1860949X 2-s2.0-84951335693 10.1007/978-3-319-26450-9_18 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84951335693&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54353 |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
topic |
Computer Science |
spellingShingle |
Computer Science Sansanee Auephanwiriyakul Yutthana Munklang Nipon Theera-Umpon Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features |
description |
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image classification is one of the challenging problems because of the difficult characteristics of SAR images. In this chapter, we implement SAR image classification on three military vehicles types, i.e., T72 tank, BMP2 armored personnel carriers (APCs), and BTR70 APCs. The texture features generated from the fuzzy co-occurrence matrix (FCOM) are utilized with the multi-class support vector machine (MSVM) and the radial basis function (RBF) network. Finally, the ensemble average is implemented as a fusion tool as well. The best detection result is at 97.94% correct detection from the fusion of twenty best FCOM with RBF network models (ten best RBF network models at d = 5 and other ten best RBF network models at d = 10). Whereas the best fusion result of FCOM with MSVM is at 95.37% correct classification. This comes from the fusion of ten best MSVM models at d = 5 and other ten best MSVM models at d = 10. As a comparison we also generate features from the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). This feature set is implemented on the same classifiers. The results from FCOM are better than those from GLCM in all cases. |
format |
Book Series |
author |
Sansanee Auephanwiriyakul Yutthana Munklang Nipon Theera-Umpon |
author_facet |
Sansanee Auephanwiriyakul Yutthana Munklang Nipon Theera-Umpon |
author_sort |
Sansanee Auephanwiriyakul |
title |
Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features |
title_short |
Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features |
title_full |
Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features |
title_fullStr |
Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features |
title_full_unstemmed |
Synthetic aperture radar (Sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features |
title_sort |
synthetic aperture radar (sar) automatic target recognition (atr) using fuzzy co-occurrence matrix texture features |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84951335693&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54353 |
_version_ |
1681424305048518656 |