Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus

© 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Objective To compare pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and those with low-risk pregnancies during implementation of the GDM practice guideline. Methods In a retrospective study, data were compared b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Supansa Srichumchit, Suchaya Luewan, Theera Tongsong
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941584479&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54741
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-54741
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-547412018-09-04T10:22:16Z Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus Supansa Srichumchit Suchaya Luewan Theera Tongsong Medicine © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Objective To compare pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and those with low-risk pregnancies during implementation of the GDM practice guideline. Methods In a retrospective study, data were compared between women with singleton pregnancies complicated by GDM and control women with singleton low-risk pregnancies who delivered at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, between January 2002 and December 2012. All pregnant women were screened and managed for GDM as recommended by the National Diabetes Data Group. Results During the study period, 1350 pregnancies with GDM and 20421 low-risk pregnancies met the study criteria and were included in the GDM group and the control group, respectively. The incidence of fetal macrosomia - the main outcome - was significantly higher in the GDM group (n = 270, 20.0%) than in the control group (n = 2776, 3.6%; adjusted odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.71; P < 0.001). The incidences of cesarean delivery, cephalopelvic disproportion, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and shoulder dystocia were also significantly higher in the GDM group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Despite the practice guideline, adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal macrosomia, cesarean delivery, and pregnancy-induced hypertension, were significantly higher among women with GDM. The findings warrant an effective audit system or improved adherence to the guideline. 2018-09-04T10:22:16Z 2018-09-04T10:22:16Z 2015-01-01 Journal 18793479 00207292 2-s2.0-84941584479 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.033 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941584479&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54741
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Supansa Srichumchit
Suchaya Luewan
Theera Tongsong
Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus
description © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Objective To compare pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and those with low-risk pregnancies during implementation of the GDM practice guideline. Methods In a retrospective study, data were compared between women with singleton pregnancies complicated by GDM and control women with singleton low-risk pregnancies who delivered at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, between January 2002 and December 2012. All pregnant women were screened and managed for GDM as recommended by the National Diabetes Data Group. Results During the study period, 1350 pregnancies with GDM and 20421 low-risk pregnancies met the study criteria and were included in the GDM group and the control group, respectively. The incidence of fetal macrosomia - the main outcome - was significantly higher in the GDM group (n = 270, 20.0%) than in the control group (n = 2776, 3.6%; adjusted odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.71; P < 0.001). The incidences of cesarean delivery, cephalopelvic disproportion, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and shoulder dystocia were also significantly higher in the GDM group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Despite the practice guideline, adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal macrosomia, cesarean delivery, and pregnancy-induced hypertension, were significantly higher among women with GDM. The findings warrant an effective audit system or improved adherence to the guideline.
format Journal
author Supansa Srichumchit
Suchaya Luewan
Theera Tongsong
author_facet Supansa Srichumchit
Suchaya Luewan
Theera Tongsong
author_sort Supansa Srichumchit
title Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus
title_short Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus
title_full Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus
title_sort outcomes of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941584479&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54741
_version_ 1681424376565596160