Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia

© Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. Debates concerning the definition of Southeast Asia as a region are intense and on-going, and the delimitation and rationale for regional analysis have become increasingly problematical in the era of globalisation. Southeast Asia is characterised, though not clearl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Victor T. King
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959386789&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55116
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-55116
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-551162018-09-05T03:14:57Z Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia Victor T. King Arts and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Economics, Econometrics and Finance Social Sciences © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. Debates concerning the definition of Southeast Asia as a region are intense and on-going, and the delimitation and rationale for regional analysis have become increasingly problematical in the era of globalisation. Southeast Asia is characterised, though not clearly and unequivocally defined by cultural diversity and openness. It has a long history of cultural connections with other parts of the world and it demonstrates the importance of physical migrations and cultural flows into, across and out of the region, which have generated cross-cultural encounters and social intercourse, with the Indian sub-continent, East Asia, the Middle East, Europe and the Americas. These interactions have in turn resulted in cultural hybridisation, synthesis and mixed or mestizo communities, the phenomena of pluralism and multiculturalism within national boundaries, and in the co-existence of culturally different majority and minority populations. The processes of cultural differentiation and interaction have made Southeast Asia one of the most culturally complex regions in the world and have complicated the process of regional definition. In spite of these cultural complexities, there are those who have argued that it is 'the ubiquity of publicly displayed cultural forms' and the fact that Southeast Asia is 'arguably the best place to look for culture' which serves to define it as a region. The centrality of culture in the definition of this region will be explored and it is proposed that the conceptualisation of the relationship between culture and identity might be a way forward in addressing these regional complexities. 2018-09-05T02:51:56Z 2018-09-05T02:51:56Z 2016-03-01 Journal 22318534 01287702 2-s2.0-84959386789 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959386789&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55116
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Arts and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Social Sciences
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Social Sciences
Victor T. King
Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia
description © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. Debates concerning the definition of Southeast Asia as a region are intense and on-going, and the delimitation and rationale for regional analysis have become increasingly problematical in the era of globalisation. Southeast Asia is characterised, though not clearly and unequivocally defined by cultural diversity and openness. It has a long history of cultural connections with other parts of the world and it demonstrates the importance of physical migrations and cultural flows into, across and out of the region, which have generated cross-cultural encounters and social intercourse, with the Indian sub-continent, East Asia, the Middle East, Europe and the Americas. These interactions have in turn resulted in cultural hybridisation, synthesis and mixed or mestizo communities, the phenomena of pluralism and multiculturalism within national boundaries, and in the co-existence of culturally different majority and minority populations. The processes of cultural differentiation and interaction have made Southeast Asia one of the most culturally complex regions in the world and have complicated the process of regional definition. In spite of these cultural complexities, there are those who have argued that it is 'the ubiquity of publicly displayed cultural forms' and the fact that Southeast Asia is 'arguably the best place to look for culture' which serves to define it as a region. The centrality of culture in the definition of this region will be explored and it is proposed that the conceptualisation of the relationship between culture and identity might be a way forward in addressing these regional complexities.
format Journal
author Victor T. King
author_facet Victor T. King
author_sort Victor T. King
title Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia
title_short Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia
title_full Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia
title_fullStr Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asia
title_sort conceptualising culture, identity and region: recent reflections on southeast asia
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959386789&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55116
_version_ 1681424445993910272