Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Background/objectives Gallstone disease and its complications are common, particularly in Western populations. Recent studies have reported a significantly increased risk of gallstones among hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Howeve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karn Wijarnpreecha, Charat Thongprayoon, Panadeekarn Panjawatanan, Wuttiporn Manatsathit, Patompong Ungprasert
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988667241&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56027
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-56027
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-560272018-09-05T03:07:57Z Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis Karn Wijarnpreecha Charat Thongprayoon Panadeekarn Panjawatanan Wuttiporn Manatsathit Patompong Ungprasert Medicine Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Background/objectives Gallstone disease and its complications are common, particularly in Western populations. Recent studies have reported a significantly increased risk of gallstones among hepatitis C virus-infected patients. However, the data on patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are still limited. This meta-analysis was carried out with the aim of summarizing all available evidence. Patients and methods A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and the EMBASE database from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HBV-infected patients versus patients without HBV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse-variance method. Results Nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. We found no significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones, with a pooled OR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). The statistical heterogeneity was moderate, with an I 2 of 69%. Subgroup analysis was carried out. The pooled OR of cross-sectional studies was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91-1.12; I 2 0%), whereas the pooled OR of case-control studies was 1.53 (95% CI, 0.85-2.74; I 2 80%). Conclusion A significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones was not observed in this study. 2018-09-05T03:07:57Z 2018-09-05T03:07:57Z 2016-11-01 Journal 14735687 0954691X 2-s2.0-84988667241 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000754 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988667241&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56027
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan
Wuttiporn Manatsathit
Patompong Ungprasert
Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
description Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Background/objectives Gallstone disease and its complications are common, particularly in Western populations. Recent studies have reported a significantly increased risk of gallstones among hepatitis C virus-infected patients. However, the data on patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are still limited. This meta-analysis was carried out with the aim of summarizing all available evidence. Patients and methods A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and the EMBASE database from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HBV-infected patients versus patients without HBV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse-variance method. Results Nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. We found no significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones, with a pooled OR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). The statistical heterogeneity was moderate, with an I 2 of 69%. Subgroup analysis was carried out. The pooled OR of cross-sectional studies was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91-1.12; I 2 0%), whereas the pooled OR of case-control studies was 1.53 (95% CI, 0.85-2.74; I 2 80%). Conclusion A significant association between HBV infection and the risk of gallstones was not observed in this study.
format Journal
author Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan
Wuttiporn Manatsathit
Patompong Ungprasert
author_facet Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan
Wuttiporn Manatsathit
Patompong Ungprasert
author_sort Karn Wijarnpreecha
title Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hepatitis B virus infection and risk of gallstones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort hepatitis b virus infection and risk of gallstones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988667241&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56027
_version_ 1681424615264485376