Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer

© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. Helical TomoTherapy(HT) planning depends on optimize parameters including field width (FW), pitch factor (PF) and modulation factor (MF). These optimize parameters are effect to quality of plans and treatment time. The aim of this study was to find th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Yawichai, I. Chitapanarux, S. Wanwilairat
Format: Conference Proceeding
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971632016&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56304
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-56304
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-563042018-09-05T03:13:53Z Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer K. Yawichai I. Chitapanarux S. Wanwilairat Physics and Astronomy © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. Helical TomoTherapy(HT) planning depends on optimize parameters including field width (FW), pitch factor (PF) and modulation factor (MF). These optimize parameters are effect to quality of plans and treatment time. The aim of this study was to find the optimized parameters which compromise between plan quality and treatment times. Six nasopharyngeal cancer patients were used. For each patient data set, 18 treatment plans consisted of different optimize parameters combination (FW=5.0, 2.5, 1.0 cm; PF=0.43, 0.287, 0.215; MF2.0, 3.0) were created. The identical optimization procedure followed ICRU83 recommendations. The average D50 of both parotid glands and treatment times per fraction were compared for all plans. The study show treatment plan with FW1.0 cm showed the lowest average D50 of both parotid glands. The treatment time increased inversely to FW. The FW1.0 cm the average treatment time was 4 times longer than FW5.0 cm. PF was very little influence on the average D50 of both parotid glands. Finally, MF increased from 2.0 to 3.0 the average D50 of both parotid glands was slightly decreased. However, the average treatment time was increased 22.28%. For routine nasopharyngeal cancer patients with HT, we suggest the planning optimization parameters consist of FW=5.0 cm, PF=0.43 and MF=2.0. 2018-09-05T03:13:53Z 2018-09-05T03:13:53Z 2016-03-24 Conference Proceeding 17426596 17426588 2-s2.0-84971632016 10.1088/1742-6596/694/1/012002 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971632016&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56304
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Physics and Astronomy
spellingShingle Physics and Astronomy
K. Yawichai
I. Chitapanarux
S. Wanwilairat
Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer
description © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. Helical TomoTherapy(HT) planning depends on optimize parameters including field width (FW), pitch factor (PF) and modulation factor (MF). These optimize parameters are effect to quality of plans and treatment time. The aim of this study was to find the optimized parameters which compromise between plan quality and treatment times. Six nasopharyngeal cancer patients were used. For each patient data set, 18 treatment plans consisted of different optimize parameters combination (FW=5.0, 2.5, 1.0 cm; PF=0.43, 0.287, 0.215; MF2.0, 3.0) were created. The identical optimization procedure followed ICRU83 recommendations. The average D50 of both parotid glands and treatment times per fraction were compared for all plans. The study show treatment plan with FW1.0 cm showed the lowest average D50 of both parotid glands. The treatment time increased inversely to FW. The FW1.0 cm the average treatment time was 4 times longer than FW5.0 cm. PF was very little influence on the average D50 of both parotid glands. Finally, MF increased from 2.0 to 3.0 the average D50 of both parotid glands was slightly decreased. However, the average treatment time was increased 22.28%. For routine nasopharyngeal cancer patients with HT, we suggest the planning optimization parameters consist of FW=5.0 cm, PF=0.43 and MF=2.0.
format Conference Proceeding
author K. Yawichai
I. Chitapanarux
S. Wanwilairat
author_facet K. Yawichai
I. Chitapanarux
S. Wanwilairat
author_sort K. Yawichai
title Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer
title_short Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer
title_full Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer
title_fullStr Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer
title_sort helical tomotherapy optimized planning parameters for nasopharyngeal cancer
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971632016&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56304
_version_ 1681424667004370944