Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods

© 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers. Some novel polymeric fibrous nonwoven meshes have been processed from solution blends of poly(L-lactide-cocaprolactone), P(LL-CL), and gelatin for use as biodegradable porous scaffolds in articular cartilage tissue engineering. P(LL-CL) copolymers with LL:CL com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wichaya Kalaithong, Robert Molloy, Tharinee Theerathanagorn, Wanida Janvikul
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84996490853&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-57012
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-570122018-09-05T03:43:49Z Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods Wichaya Kalaithong Robert Molloy Tharinee Theerathanagorn Wanida Janvikul Chemistry Materials Science © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers. Some novel polymeric fibrous nonwoven meshes have been processed from solution blends of poly(L-lactide-cocaprolactone), P(LL-CL), and gelatin for use as biodegradable porous scaffolds in articular cartilage tissue engineering. P(LL-CL) copolymers with LL:CL compositions ranging from 50:50 to 80:20 mol% were synthesized via the bulk ring-opening copolymerization of L-lactide (LL) and ε-caprolactone (CL) using tin(II) octoate, Sn(Oct)2, as the initiator. To make the hydrophobic P(LL-CL) more hydrophilic for cell culture, it was solution blended with gelatin using trifluoroethanol as a common solvent to give P(LL-CL):gelatin contents in the final scaffolds ranging from 70:30 to 95:5 wt%. Two different processing methods were used: electrospinning and wet spinning. Although electrospinning gave a more uniform mesh of nanosized fibers, the nonwoven mesh from wet spinning with its much larger pores and greater pliability was found to be more suitable for water absorption, cell infiltration and shape-forming. Scanning electron micrographs of the scaffolds from the two techniques are compared. From the results obtained, the wet-spun P(LL-CL)50:50/gelatin 95:5 scaffold gave the best combination of properties. In particular, the 5% gelatin content resulted in a fivefold increase in the scaffold’s equilibrium water uptake from about 10% to over 50% by weight. 2018-09-05T03:33:51Z 2018-09-05T03:33:51Z 2017-01-01 Journal 15482634 00323888 2-s2.0-84996490853 10.1002/pen.24464 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84996490853&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57012
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Chemistry
Materials Science
spellingShingle Chemistry
Materials Science
Wichaya Kalaithong
Robert Molloy
Tharinee Theerathanagorn
Wanida Janvikul
Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods
description © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers. Some novel polymeric fibrous nonwoven meshes have been processed from solution blends of poly(L-lactide-cocaprolactone), P(LL-CL), and gelatin for use as biodegradable porous scaffolds in articular cartilage tissue engineering. P(LL-CL) copolymers with LL:CL compositions ranging from 50:50 to 80:20 mol% were synthesized via the bulk ring-opening copolymerization of L-lactide (LL) and ε-caprolactone (CL) using tin(II) octoate, Sn(Oct)2, as the initiator. To make the hydrophobic P(LL-CL) more hydrophilic for cell culture, it was solution blended with gelatin using trifluoroethanol as a common solvent to give P(LL-CL):gelatin contents in the final scaffolds ranging from 70:30 to 95:5 wt%. Two different processing methods were used: electrospinning and wet spinning. Although electrospinning gave a more uniform mesh of nanosized fibers, the nonwoven mesh from wet spinning with its much larger pores and greater pliability was found to be more suitable for water absorption, cell infiltration and shape-forming. Scanning electron micrographs of the scaffolds from the two techniques are compared. From the results obtained, the wet-spun P(LL-CL)50:50/gelatin 95:5 scaffold gave the best combination of properties. In particular, the 5% gelatin content resulted in a fivefold increase in the scaffold’s equilibrium water uptake from about 10% to over 50% by weight.
format Journal
author Wichaya Kalaithong
Robert Molloy
Tharinee Theerathanagorn
Wanida Janvikul
author_facet Wichaya Kalaithong
Robert Molloy
Tharinee Theerathanagorn
Wanida Janvikul
author_sort Wichaya Kalaithong
title Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods
title_short Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods
title_full Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods
title_fullStr Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods
title_full_unstemmed Novel poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: Comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods
title_sort novel poly(l-lactide-co-caprolactone)/gelatin porous scaffolds for use in articular cartilage tissue engineering: comparison of electrospinning and wet spinning processing methods
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84996490853&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57012
_version_ 1681424799403868160