Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region

© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. Several global narratives around resource insecurities have reached the Mekong Region. In the latest reincarnation, experts, bureaucrats and businesses have called for greater attention to a water-energy-food nexus. It is not clear however, if they are talking about the same thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louis Lebel, Boripat Lebel
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028470857&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57408
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-57408
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-574082018-09-05T03:55:02Z Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region Louis Lebel Boripat Lebel Environmental Science Social Sciences © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. Several global narratives around resource insecurities have reached the Mekong Region. In the latest reincarnation, experts, bureaucrats and businesses have called for greater attention to a water-energy-food nexus. It is not clear however, if they are talking about the same thing, with the same purpose or that decision-makers are listening. The purpose of this study was to identify the key features of nexus narratives globally, and then analyze how they are being used in the Mekong Region. We used the Narrative Policy Framework to explore narrative content and strategies, and Cultural Theory to help identify policy beliefs of competing coalitions in a mixed-methods analysis. Increasing resource scarcity, which undermines security, was a shared setting in all nexus narratives. Individualist and Hierarchist narratives tend to de-politicize the nexus by promising solutions from innovative businesses and free markets, or through technocratic and managerial control of resources and the environment by bureaucrats. Egalitarian narratives identify victims and villains to re-politicize the nexus around themes of justice and human security. Nexus narratives were used to support and oppose hydropower, irrigation and biofuel development, with Individualist narratives consistently being the most pro-development. Nexus narratives have been widely adopted by international organizations and foreign experts working in the Mekong Region; however, with a few exceptions, they have as of yet had little direct influence on national policy or plans. Several possible reasons are discussed, including limitations of the concept itself. 2018-09-05T03:40:45Z 2018-09-05T03:40:45Z 2017-01-01 Journal 18736416 14629011 2-s2.0-85028470857 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.015 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028470857&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57408
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Environmental Science
Social Sciences
spellingShingle Environmental Science
Social Sciences
Louis Lebel
Boripat Lebel
Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region
description © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. Several global narratives around resource insecurities have reached the Mekong Region. In the latest reincarnation, experts, bureaucrats and businesses have called for greater attention to a water-energy-food nexus. It is not clear however, if they are talking about the same thing, with the same purpose or that decision-makers are listening. The purpose of this study was to identify the key features of nexus narratives globally, and then analyze how they are being used in the Mekong Region. We used the Narrative Policy Framework to explore narrative content and strategies, and Cultural Theory to help identify policy beliefs of competing coalitions in a mixed-methods analysis. Increasing resource scarcity, which undermines security, was a shared setting in all nexus narratives. Individualist and Hierarchist narratives tend to de-politicize the nexus by promising solutions from innovative businesses and free markets, or through technocratic and managerial control of resources and the environment by bureaucrats. Egalitarian narratives identify victims and villains to re-politicize the nexus around themes of justice and human security. Nexus narratives were used to support and oppose hydropower, irrigation and biofuel development, with Individualist narratives consistently being the most pro-development. Nexus narratives have been widely adopted by international organizations and foreign experts working in the Mekong Region; however, with a few exceptions, they have as of yet had little direct influence on national policy or plans. Several possible reasons are discussed, including limitations of the concept itself.
format Journal
author Louis Lebel
Boripat Lebel
author_facet Louis Lebel
Boripat Lebel
author_sort Louis Lebel
title Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region
title_short Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region
title_full Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region
title_fullStr Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region
title_full_unstemmed Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region
title_sort nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the mekong region
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028470857&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57408
_version_ 1681424873369370624