Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis
© 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Background/Objectives: Gallstones and its complications are one of the most common hepatobiliary tract diseases. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with hepati...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035142647&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57588 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-57588 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-575882018-09-05T03:46:29Z Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis Karn Wijarnpreecha Charat Thongprayoon Panadeekarn Panjawatanan Natasorn Lekuthai Patompong Ungprasert Medicine © 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Background/Objectives: Gallstones and its complications are one of the most common hepatobiliary tract diseases. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection might be at an increased risk of gallstones. However, the data on this relationship remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to summarize all available evidence. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: Eleven studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled OR of gallstones in HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.35 to 2.48, I2= 89%). Subgroup analysis showed that significant risk was increased for both male (pooled OR of 2.07, 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.76) and female (pooled OR of 3.00, 95% CI, 2.16 to 4.17). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients. Further studies are required to clarify how this risk should be addressed in the clinical picture. 2018-09-05T03:46:29Z 2018-09-05T03:46:29Z 2017-11-01 Journal 17565391 17565383 2-s2.0-85035142647 10.1111/jebm.12277 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035142647&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57588 |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Karn Wijarnpreecha Charat Thongprayoon Panadeekarn Panjawatanan Natasorn Lekuthai Patompong Ungprasert Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis |
description |
© 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Background/Objectives: Gallstones and its complications are one of the most common hepatobiliary tract diseases. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection might be at an increased risk of gallstones. However, the data on this relationship remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to summarize all available evidence. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: Eleven studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled OR of gallstones in HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.35 to 2.48, I2= 89%). Subgroup analysis showed that significant risk was increased for both male (pooled OR of 2.07, 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.76) and female (pooled OR of 3.00, 95% CI, 2.16 to 4.17). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients. Further studies are required to clarify how this risk should be addressed in the clinical picture. |
format |
Journal |
author |
Karn Wijarnpreecha Charat Thongprayoon Panadeekarn Panjawatanan Natasorn Lekuthai Patompong Ungprasert |
author_facet |
Karn Wijarnpreecha Charat Thongprayoon Panadeekarn Panjawatanan Natasorn Lekuthai Patompong Ungprasert |
author_sort |
Karn Wijarnpreecha |
title |
Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis |
title_short |
Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis |
title_full |
Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis |
title_sort |
hepatitis c virus infection and risk of gallstones: a meta-analysis |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035142647&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57588 |
_version_ |
1681424906718281728 |