Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis

© 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Background/Objectives: Gallstones and its complications are one of the most common hepatobiliary tract diseases. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with hepati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karn Wijarnpreecha, Charat Thongprayoon, Panadeekarn Panjawatanan, Natasorn Lekuthai, Patompong Ungprasert
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035142647&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57588
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-57588
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-575882018-09-05T03:46:29Z Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis Karn Wijarnpreecha Charat Thongprayoon Panadeekarn Panjawatanan Natasorn Lekuthai Patompong Ungprasert Medicine © 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Background/Objectives: Gallstones and its complications are one of the most common hepatobiliary tract diseases. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection might be at an increased risk of gallstones. However, the data on this relationship remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to summarize all available evidence. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: Eleven studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled OR of gallstones in HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.35 to 2.48, I2= 89%). Subgroup analysis showed that significant risk was increased for both male (pooled OR of 2.07, 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.76) and female (pooled OR of 3.00, 95% CI, 2.16 to 4.17). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients. Further studies are required to clarify how this risk should be addressed in the clinical picture. 2018-09-05T03:46:29Z 2018-09-05T03:46:29Z 2017-11-01 Journal 17565391 17565383 2-s2.0-85035142647 10.1111/jebm.12277 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035142647&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57588
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan
Natasorn Lekuthai
Patompong Ungprasert
Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis
description © 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Background/Objectives: Gallstones and its complications are one of the most common hepatobiliary tract diseases. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection might be at an increased risk of gallstones. However, the data on this relationship remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to summarize all available evidence. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to May 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: Eleven studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled OR of gallstones in HCV-infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.35 to 2.48, I2= 89%). Subgroup analysis showed that significant risk was increased for both male (pooled OR of 2.07, 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.76) and female (pooled OR of 3.00, 95% CI, 2.16 to 4.17). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of gallstones among HCV-infected patients. Further studies are required to clarify how this risk should be addressed in the clinical picture.
format Journal
author Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan
Natasorn Lekuthai
Patompong Ungprasert
author_facet Karn Wijarnpreecha
Charat Thongprayoon
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan
Natasorn Lekuthai
Patompong Ungprasert
author_sort Karn Wijarnpreecha
title Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis
title_short Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis
title_full Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of gallstones: A meta-analysis
title_sort hepatitis c virus infection and risk of gallstones: a meta-analysis
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035142647&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57588
_version_ 1681424906718281728