Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective

© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Aims: An economic evidence is a vital tool that can inform the decision to use costly insulin analogs. This study aimed to evaluate long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir (IDet) compared with insulin glargine (IGlar) in typ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Unchalee Permsuwan, Kednapa Thavorn, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul, Surasak Saokaew, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85023172990&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57617
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-57617
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-576172018-09-05T03:46:58Z Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective Unchalee Permsuwan Kednapa Thavorn Piyameth Dilokthornsakul Surasak Saokaew Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk Medicine © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Aims: An economic evidence is a vital tool that can inform the decision to use costly insulin analogs. This study aimed to evaluate long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir (IDet) compared with insulin glargine (IGlar) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from the Thai payer’s perspective. Methods: Long-term costs and outcomes were projected using a validated IMS CORE Diabetes Model, version 8.5. Cohort characteristics, baseline risk factors, and costs of diabetes complications were derived from Thai data sources. Relative risk was derived from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was presented in 2015 US Dollars (USD). A series of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: IDet yielded slightly greater quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (8.921 vs 8.908), but incurred higher costs than IGlar (90,417.63 USD vs 66,674.03 USD), resulting in an ICER of ∼1.7 million USD per QALY. The findings were very sensitive to the cost of IDet. With a 34% reduction in the IDet cost, treatment with IDet would become cost-effective according to the Thai threshold of 4,434.59 USD per QALY. Conclusions: Treatment with IDet in patients with T2DM who had uncontrolled blood glucose with oral anti-diabetic agents was not a cost-effective strategy compared with IGlar treatment in the Thai context. These findings could be generalized to other countries with a similar socioeconomics level and healthcare systems. 2018-09-05T03:46:58Z 2018-09-05T03:46:58Z 2017-09-02 Journal 1941837X 13696998 2-s2.0-85023172990 10.1080/13696998.2017.1347792 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85023172990&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57617
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Unchalee Permsuwan
Kednapa Thavorn
Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
Surasak Saokaew
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective
description © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Aims: An economic evidence is a vital tool that can inform the decision to use costly insulin analogs. This study aimed to evaluate long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir (IDet) compared with insulin glargine (IGlar) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from the Thai payer’s perspective. Methods: Long-term costs and outcomes were projected using a validated IMS CORE Diabetes Model, version 8.5. Cohort characteristics, baseline risk factors, and costs of diabetes complications were derived from Thai data sources. Relative risk was derived from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was presented in 2015 US Dollars (USD). A series of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: IDet yielded slightly greater quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (8.921 vs 8.908), but incurred higher costs than IGlar (90,417.63 USD vs 66,674.03 USD), resulting in an ICER of ∼1.7 million USD per QALY. The findings were very sensitive to the cost of IDet. With a 34% reduction in the IDet cost, treatment with IDet would become cost-effective according to the Thai threshold of 4,434.59 USD per QALY. Conclusions: Treatment with IDet in patients with T2DM who had uncontrolled blood glucose with oral anti-diabetic agents was not a cost-effective strategy compared with IGlar treatment in the Thai context. These findings could be generalized to other countries with a similar socioeconomics level and healthcare systems.
format Journal
author Unchalee Permsuwan
Kednapa Thavorn
Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
Surasak Saokaew
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
author_facet Unchalee Permsuwan
Kednapa Thavorn
Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
Surasak Saokaew
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
author_sort Unchalee Permsuwan
title Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective
title_short Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective
title_full Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for Thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective
title_sort cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for thai type 2 diabetes from a payer’s perspective
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85023172990&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57617
_version_ 1681424912089088000